Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ahuja Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$6kHousing & Shelter$5kHuman Services$5kInternational$5kFood & Nutrition$2kYouth Development$1kCommunity Improvement$1kReligion$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $32k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$84k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROTARY CLUB OF ARLINGTON$32,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$500
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$500
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$500
MISSION ARLINGTON$500
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Tarrant County$500
ARLINGTON CHARITIES$500
COOK CHILDRENS$500
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON$500
THE ASSOCIATION FOR$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARLINGTON CHARITIES: $500 → 11%ARLINGTON CHARITIES: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Ahuja Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ahuja Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 10 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$53k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+10%

Still filing today

60%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterPhilanthropyEducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF ARLINGTON
    2× · 2024–2025 · $33k · revenue +29% · 33% of their budget
  • MM
    MISSION METROPLEX INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue +182%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    4× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • CC
    CINDERELLA CHARITY BALL
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • AF
    ASHNA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • TO
    THE OAKRIDGE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $300 · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michael Wilkinson Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Arlington Food Assistance Center

To provide dignified access to free groceries for qualified families in Arlington, VA and surrounding counties.

Food & Nutrition
3
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
4
Dental Health for Arlington Inc

To provide preventive and pain-relieving dental care to the underserved residents in Tarrant County and to educate children about proper oral hygiene habits, nutrition, and the importance of regular dental care.

Health
5
Theatre Arlington Inc

Theatre Arlington enhances the quality of life in North Texas by presenting superior, diverse artistic experiences through performance, production, and education.

Arts & Culture
6
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
7
Arlington Woman's Club

The mission of the arlington woman's club is to promote and develop the potential of its members through education and to benefit the community through its philanthropic projects.

Education
8
State Fair of Texas

The state fair of texas celebrates all things texan by promoting agriculture, education, and community involvement through quality entertainment in a family-friendly environment. the state fair of texas is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit…

Recreation & Sports
9
Lions Foundation of Greater Arlington Inc
Human Services
10
Cook Children's Health Care System

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
11
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
12
Arlington Community Food Bank

The Arlington Community Food Bank's mission is to help end hunger in our community at its root cause.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Metroplex Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wi Cook Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY CLUB OF ARLINGTON: $33,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF ARLINGTONMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONTarrant Area Food Bank: $2,000 · Other+7 more: $5,350 · Other+7 moreARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterARLINGTON…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · InternationalTHE ROTAR…MISSION METROPLEX INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMISSION M…WI Cook Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthARLINGTON CHARITIES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC: $500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE OAKRIDGE SCHOOL: $300 · Education
Other$42,850Housing & Shelter$5,000International$5,000Philanthropy$5,000Health$2,000Human Services$1,000Youth Development$500Education$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROTARY CLUB OF ARLINGTON: $33,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION METROPLEX INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWI Cook Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON CHARITIES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OAKRIDGE SCHOOL: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF ARLINGTON ↗
  • Who funds ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MISSION METROPLEX INC ↗
  • Who funds WI Cook Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds ARLINGTON CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OAKRIDGE SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ahuja Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ahuja Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ahuja Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ahuja Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ahuja Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph