Skip to content
Agnes C Oliver Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Agnes C Oliver Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$289k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$864kHuman Services$350kEducation$254kReligion$156kEnvironment$117kAnimals$117kCommunity Improvement$117kRecreation & Sports$117k
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$16,069
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alzheimer's Association$16,069
American Cancer Society$16,069
Baylor Healthcare System$16,069
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital$16,069
Northpark Presbyterian Church$16,069
Bridge Breast Network$16,069
Easter Seals of Greater Dallas$16,069
Junior League of Dallas$16,069
Big Thought$16,069
The Salvation Army$16,069
Classical School of Dallas$16,069
Dallas Arboretum & Botanical Garden$16,069
Camp John Marc$16,069
Dallas County Medical Society$16,069
Storey Lane Independent Living Inc$16,069
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $233k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Family Place Inc: $18k → 14%Family Place Inc: $16k → 14%Family Place Inc: $15k → 14%Family Place Inc: $15k → 14%Family Place Inc: $14k → 14%Family Place Inc: $14k → 14%Family Place Inc: $13k → 14%Family Place Inc: $12k → 14%Storey Lane Independent Living Inc: $18k → 14%Storey Lane Independent Living Inc: $16k → 14%Storey Lane Independent Living Inc: $15k → 14%Storey Lane Independent Living Inc: $15k → 14%Storey Lane Independent Living Inc: $14k → 14%Storey Lane Independent Living Inc: $14k → 14%Storey Lane Independent Living Inc: $13k → 14%Storey Lane Independent Living Inc: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 20 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$2.0M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+24%

Still filing today

65%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +145%
  • SL
    STOREY LANE INDEPENDENT LIVING INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +31%
  • TF
    The Family Place
    8× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • WD
    WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +24%
  • FA
    Foundation at Highland Park Presbyterian Classical School of Dallas
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • TH
    The Hillier School Inc Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
2
Baylor Medical Center at Irving

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Lake Pointe Operating Company Llc

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Scott & White Hospital-Taylor

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
12
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children; the most unlike its peers is Big Thought. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Easter Seals of Greater Dallas: $116,535 · OtherEaster Seals of Greater DallasSalvation Army: $116,535 · OtherSalvation ArmyNORTHPARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $116,535 · OtherNORTHPARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHAlzheimer's Association: $116,533 · OtherAlzheimer's AssociationCamp John Marc: $116,533 · OtherCamp John MarcAmerican Cancer Society: $116,533 · OtherAmerican Cancer SocietyDallas Medical Society Alliance Edith Cavell Nursing Scholarship Fund: $68,458 · OtherDallas Medical Society Alliance Edith Cavell Nu…DALLAS COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $48,077 · OtherDALLAS COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETYTHE FOUNDATION AT HIGHLAND PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $39,522 · Other+2 more: $28,936 · OtherTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $116,537 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FO…Carter BloodCare: $116,535 · HealthCarter BloodCareTHE BRIDGE BREAST NETWORK INC: $116,533 · HealthTHE BRIDGE BREAST NETWORK INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $116,533 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncBaylor Health Care System: $116,533 · HealthBaylor Health Care SystemSTOREY LANE INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $116,536 · Human ServicesSTOREY LANE …The Family Place: $116,536 · Human ServicesThe Family P…JUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC: $116,535 · Community ImprovementDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $116,535 · EnvironmentBIG THOUGHT: $108,581 · Arts & CultureCLASSICAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC: $30,124 · EducationWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $17,953 · Education
Other$884,197Health$582,671Human Services$233,072Community Improvement$116,535Environment$116,535Arts & Culture$108,581Education$48,077

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $116,537 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTOREY LANE INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $116,536 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetThe Family Place: $116,536 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCarter BloodCare: $116,535 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC: $116,535 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $116,535 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGE BREAST NETWORK INC: $116,533 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $116,533 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor Health Care System: $116,533 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBIG THOUGHT: $108,581 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $48,077 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION AT HIGHLAND PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $39,522 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetCLASSICAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC: $30,124 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $17,953 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds STOREY LANE INDEPENDENT LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds Carter BloodCare ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE BREAST NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System ↗
  • Who funds BIG THOUGHT ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION AT HIGHLAND PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds CLASSICAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Hillcrest FoundationRoy and Christine Stu…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Dallas FoundationTX19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Hillcrest Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agnes C Oliver Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agnes C Oliver Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Agnes C Oliver’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home