Skip to content

· Private foundation

Aetas Mirabilis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$4.3MSocial Science$245kHuman Services$207kHousing & Shelter$147kFood & Nutrition$136kHealth$71kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kInternational$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$376k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Depauw University$1,104,000
Food for others$30,000
Harvard Business School$30,000
Americares$20,000
Feeding America$10,000
Shelter House$10,000
Women Giving Back$10,000
GrareVineorg$6,716
American Friends of the School of St Jude$2,640
Vanderbilt University$2,500
John Burroughs School$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WEST SUBURBAN YMCA: $250 → 8%Food for Others: $15k → 4%Shepherd's Center of Northern Virginia: $500 → 6%Homeaid National Capital Region: $10k → 6%Food for others: $30k → 6%Food for Others: $5k → 6%Food for Others: $5k → 6%Family Pass: $1k → 6%Family PASS: $1k → 6%Family PASS: $750 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
WY
SD
IN
OH
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 28 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
34

Total granted

$5.0M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+35%

Still filing today

46%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DePauw University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.1M · revenue +43%
  • WG
    Women Giving Back Inc
    6× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +553%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR OTHERS INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FUND FOR DEPAUW
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • RV
    RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +123%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Benaroya Research Institute At Virginia

To advance the science that will predict, prevent, reverse, and cure diseases of the immune system such as autoimmune disease, allergy, and asthma.

Health
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
8
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humanity Forward Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Homestreet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DePauw University: $4,071,150 · EducationDePauw University+4 more: $38,900 · EducationHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $245,300 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS S…HOME AID NORTHERN VA: $128,500 · OtherHOME AID NORTHERN …HOMEAID OF NORTHERN VIRGINA: $91,250 · OtherHOMEAID OF NORTHER…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE SCHOOL OF ST JUDE: $53,720 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS O…THE FUND FOR DEPAUW: $50,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR DEPAU…UVA PARENTS FUND: $35,000 · OtherUniversity of Michigan: $34,000 · OtherFeeding America: $30,000 · OtherAMERICARES: $30,000 · Other+34 more: $145,910 · Other+34 moreWomen Giving Back Inc: $76,500 · EmploymentFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $55,150 · Human ServicesHousing Trust Fund of Northern Virginia (dba Homeaid Northern Virginia): $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PRESERVATION AND STRENGTHENING SERVICES: $2,750 · Human Services+2 more: $750 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $45,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · InternationalDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $20,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · Health+5 more: $1,169 · Health
Education$4,110,050Other$843,680Employment$76,500Human Services$68,650Food & Nutrition$50,000International$40,000Health$22,169

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDePauw University: $4,071,150 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetWomen Giving Back Inc: $76,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetFOOD FOR OTHERS INC: $55,150 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFeeding America: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $37,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $34,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomestreet Foundation: $17,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $15,500 over 3y, 55% of budgetShelter House Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANITY FORWARD FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPECAM INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHousing Trust Fund of Northern Virginia (dba Homeaid Northern Virginia): $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PRESERVATION AND STRENGTHENING SERVICES: $2,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN VIRGINIA MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Shepherd's Center of Northern Virginia: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $261 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPotomac Soccer Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $188 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ABILITY EXPERIENCE: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN A NEW GROOVE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJASON MADACHY FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DePauw University ↗
  • Who funds Women Giving Back Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR OTHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Homestreet Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Shelter House Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANITY FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPECAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Housing Trust Fund of Northern Virginia (dba Homeaid Northern Virginia) ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PRESERVATION AND STRENGTHENING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Closet of the Greater Herndon Area IncVA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Closet of the Greater Herndon Area Inc · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Van Metre Companies Foundation Inc · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aetas Mirabilis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aetas Mirabilis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • West Suburban Young Men's Christian Association: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aetas Mirabilis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Aetas Mirabilis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aetas Mirabilis’ filings →

More from the funding graph