Skip to content
Adducci Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Adducci Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$48kEducation$39kCrime & Legal$4kHealth$3kHuman Services$2kInternational$2kCivil Rights$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$204k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
David Zimmerman Educational Scholarship$3,225
UCAN$3,000
Gun Violence Prevention Action Committee$1,500
Build Inc$1,000
Viking Ventures Group NFP$1,000
XO World Project Foundation$600
I Am ALS$525
Jason Homedew Scholarship$500
Individual grant recipient$250
The American Red Cross$250
Friends of the Forest Preserves$250
The Arbutus Foundation Inc$250
Aurora Area Interfaith Food Pantry$250
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation$100
Neighbors Helping Neighbors Inc$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hope is Restored: $250 → 14%The American Red Cross: $250 → 14%Liftup Communities: $258 → 14%UHLICH CHILDRENS ADVANTAGE NETWORK: $10k → 14%UHLICH CHILDRENS ADVANTAGE NETWORK: $2k → 14%UHLICH CHILDRENS ADVANTAGE NETWORK: $1k → 14%UCAN: $3k → 14%UCAN: $3k → 14%UCAN: $1k → 14%Of Color Inc: $1k → 14%UCAN: $1k → 14%Of Color Inc: $500 → 14%Of Color Inc: $250 → 14%Community Support Services: $100 → 14%Community Support Services: $100 → 14%UCAN: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
IN
OH
NJ
CA
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$74k · 18 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
28

Total granted

$74k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
0%

Still filing today

50%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthEnvironmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • U
    UCAN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +78%
  • BI
    BUILD INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +795%
  • OM
    ONE MILLION DEGREES
    2× · 2019–2020 · $3k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • KG
    Kevin Galindo Educational Scholarship
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • TU
    Tricoci University
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
3
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
4
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention

To saves lives and bring hope to those affected by suicide.

Health
5
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
6
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
7
Aire Ventures Inc

At aire ventures, we scale technology and innovation solutions to systemic gaps in access, opportunity, and racial equity.

Community Improvement
8
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
9
Volunteers of America of Illinois

Volunteers of america of illinois partners with the people we serve to create transformational and lasting change in their lives through programs that support, empower, and transform.

—
10
Aids Foundation of Chicago

The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.

Health
11
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
12
Only One Inc

Harness the power of collective action to rebuild ocean life in this generation, for people and the planet.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund; the most unlike its peers is Leesburg Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
17/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OGDEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherOGDEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $8,090 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBUILD INC: $7,500 · OtherBUILD INCDavid Zimmerman Educational Scholarship: $5,225 · OtherDavid Zimmerman Educational ScholarshipIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKevin Galindo Educational Scholarship: $5,000 · OtherKevin Galindo Educational ScholarshipTricoci University: $4,800 · OtherTricoci UniversityIndividual grant recipient: $4,036 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAllen Serving Educational Scholarship: $4,000 · OtherAllen Serving Educational ScholarshipGUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION EDUCATION: $3,500 · Other+25 more: $10,375 · Other+25 moreUCAN: $23,750 · Human ServicesUCANOf Color Inc: $1,750 · Human ServicesOf Color Inc+5 more: $1,058 · Human ServicesONE MILLION DEGREES: $2,550 · EducationONE AIM ILLINOIS: $1,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $417 · EducationDistinctive Schools of Illinois: $300 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationNEW VENTURE FUND: $1,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE FOREST PRESERVES: $250 · EnvironmentGUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION ACTION COMMITTEE: $1,500 · Crime & LegalXO WORLD PROJECT FOUNDATION: $600 · HealthI AM ALS: $525 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $100 · HealthUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $1,000 · International
Other$67,526Human Services$26,558Education$4,367Environment$1,750Crime & Legal$1,500Health$1,325International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCAN: $23,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBUILD INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES: $2,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOf Color Inc: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION ACTION COMMITTEE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetONE AIM ILLINOIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA AREA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetI AM ALS: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOX VALLEY PARK FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $417 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARBUTUS FOUNDATION INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDistinctive Schools of Illinois: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFT UP COMMUNITIES: $258 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FOREST PRESERVES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE IS RESTORED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave the Prairie Society: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNo One Left Behind: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Children's Charities: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONIA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Area Mountain Bikers Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRole Model Movement Inc (NFP): $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEESBURG HUMANE SOCIETY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arie and Ida Crown Me…The Chicago Community…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arie and Ida Crown MemorialIL13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adducci Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adducci Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adducci Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home