Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE.

$48M
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212022.

Food & Nutrition$493kHousing & Shelter$366kHuman Services$343kReligion$231kEmployment$96kEducation$77kHealth$46kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $383,604 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $47,512,458 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $47,128,854 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $286k
$14,497
Median grant
2
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Family Promise Montco PA$100,000
Murphy's Giving Market$76,809
Lutheran Settlement House Senior Center$56,000
Haitian Evangelical Baptist Church$53,191
Victory Assembly of God$27,584
Mighty Writers - North$17,540
Pottstown Cluster of Religious Communities$14,497
Small Things$13,883
Grace Tabernacle Christian Church$9,063
Catholic Social Services Montgomery County$7,200
Interfaith Food Cupboard$5,945
Church of Christian Compassion$1,392
Manna On Main Street$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $557k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CYWA: $4k → 6%Family Promise Montco PA: $154k → 7%Cathedral Kitchen: $35k → 12%Family Promise Montco PA: $100k → 7%Phoenixville Area Com Svc FC: $150k → 6%Greater Philadelphia Asian Social Service Center: $3k → 22%The Simple Way: $54k → 22%Methodist Services: $53k → 22%Keep It Real CDC: $4k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 10 repeat orgs$747k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
27

Total granted

$1.2M
$729k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
-1%

Still filing today

60%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEmploymentEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $254k · revenue +141%
  • MG
    MURPHYS GIVING MARKET INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $154k · revenue +604%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $112k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • PA
    PHOENIXVILLE AREA COMMUNITY SERVICESgraduated
    2× · 2021–2022 · $150k · revenue +275%
  • MS
    MID-ATLANTIC STATES CAREER & EDUCATION CENTER INCgraduated
    5× · 2021–2025 · $96k · revenue +210%
  • TG
    THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD
    5× · 2021–2025 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
2
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Maranatha Ministry Inc

To provide food and transitional housing to low income/homeless families and individuals in franklin and surrounding counties in pa

Human Services
4
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
5
Northwest Mutual Aid Collective Inc

To combat food insecurity and food waste by providing home-delivered fresh produce and pantry essentials to seniors, disabled residents, and low-income families in northwest philadelphia while also supporting local pantries, shelters, and…

Food & Nutrition
6
People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Papermill Food Hub Inc

Providing food, diapers and household essentials to families in need in Philadelphia.

8
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

9
Lancaster County Food Hub

Rooted in faith and compassion we provide services that honor the dignity of all by striving to meet basic human needs.

Religion
10
The People Who Care Food Cupboard

The mission of the food cupboard is to nourish and feed those in our community who are unable to do so on their own primarily due to limited financial resources.

Food & Nutrition
11
Portland Upper Mt Bethel Food Pantr

Ngo food pantry

Food & Nutrition
12
Community Kitchen Pittsburgh

Community kitchen pittsburgh is a nonprofit food service company. because poverty, food insecurity and employment are entwined issues, we work across these focus areas, engaging in the following activities: "culinary based workforce…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise Montco Pa and the most unlike its peers is NORTH10 Philadelphia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Housing and CarePediatric Medical ServicesProfessional Industry Assoc…Community Development Corpo…Legal Aid and Health Advoca…Hospital Systems and Networ…Philadelphia Arts Organizat…Youth Education & Developme…Behavioral Health & Disabil…Professional Performing Art…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr15%8%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr14%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%9%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr18%9%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr14%39%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%9/348
the rest of the field
14%
2,929/21,146

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

190 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
180/190
Grantees still filing
97/190
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE SYNOD OF THE REFOR PRESBYTERIAN CHRC OF NORTH AMER — $274,966 · OtherTRUSTEES OF THE SYNOD OF THE REFOR PRESBYTERIAN CHRC OF NORTH …MURPHYS GIVING MARKET INC — $154,213 · OtherMURPHYS GIVING MARKET INCVICTORY ASSEMBLY OF GOD — $113,227 · OtherVICTORY ASSEMBLY OF GODLUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY — $112,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETYDIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIA — $66,156 · OtherDIOCESE OF PENNSYLVANIATHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD — $60,075 · OtherTHE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GODEVANGELICAL HAITIAN CHURCH GERMANTOWN — $57,191 · OtherEVANGELICAL HAITIAN CHURCH GERMANTOWNUPPER ROOM BAPTIST CHURCH — $52,233 · OtherMANNA ON MAIN STREET — $50,603 · OtherMt Zion CME — $42,000 · Other+17 more — $82,379 · Other+17 moreFAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA — $253,919 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PAPHOENIXVILLE AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES — $150,000 · Human ServicesPHOENIXVILLE AREA COMMUNITY SERV…THE SIMPLE WAY — $53,690 · Human ServicesTHE SIMPLE WAYMETHODIST SERVICES — $53,421 · Human ServicesMETHODIST SERVICESTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC — $34,532 · Human ServicesTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC+3 more — $11,475 · Human ServicesMID-ATLANTIC STATES CAREER & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $95,872 · EmploymentCHERRY HILL FOOD AND OUTREACH COUNCIL — $50,075 · Food & NutritionCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $28,682 · Food & NutritionMIGHTY WRITERS — $76,540 · EducationDEPAUL USA INC — $47,600 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,065,043Human Services$557,037Employment$95,872Food & Nutrition$78,757Education$76,540Housing & Shelter$47,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA — $253,919 over 5y, 10% of budgetPHOENIXVILLE AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES — $150,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY — $112,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMID-ATLANTIC STATES CAREER & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $95,872 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetMIGHTY WRITERS — $76,540 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SIMPLE WAY — $53,690 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetMETHODIST SERVICES — $53,421 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMANNA ON MAIN STREET — $50,603 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHERRY HILL FOOD AND OUTREACH COUNCIL — $50,075 over 5y, 17% of budgetDEPAUL USA INC — $47,600 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC — $34,532 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $28,682 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPottstown Cluster of Religious Communiti — $15,497 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Social Services — $7,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH & WOMEN'S ALLIANCE — $4,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAST YOUR CARES INC — $4,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetGREATER PHILADELPHIA ASIAN SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER — $3,475 over 5y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA
  • Who funds MURPHYS GIVING MARKET INC
  • Who funds PHOENIXVILLE AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL MISSION SOCIETY
  • Who funds MID-ATLANTIC STATES CAREER & EDUCATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds MIGHTY WRITERS
  • Who funds THE SIMPLE WAY
  • Who funds METHODIST SERVICES
  • Who funds MANNA ON MAIN STREET
  • Who funds CHERRY HILL FOOD AND OUTREACH COUNCIL
  • Who funds DEPAUL USA INC
  • Who funds THE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Pottstown Cluster of Religious Communiti
  • Who funds Catholic Social Services
  • Who funds OPPORT-UNITY
  • Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH & WOMEN'S ALLIANCE
  • Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION
  • Who funds CAST YOUR CARES INC
  • Who funds GREATER PHILADELPHIA ASIAN SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

W W Smith Charitable TrustMO92.5× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: W W Smith Charitable Trust · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Connelly Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · Quest for the Best · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Genuardi Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Philabundance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $71M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph