Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abrahamson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.5MEducation$479kArts & Culture$197kEnvironment$162kFood & Nutrition$66kHuman Services$58kInternational$37kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRESH AIR FUND$100,000
ADIRONDACK COUNCIL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$5,000
HORIZONS AT SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY$5,000
FRIENDS OF CHRIST IN INDIA$5,000
WILTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
WILTON LIBRARY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CT LEAGUE OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$1,500
ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST$1,500
GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND$1,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$1,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY$1,000
ELM CITY MONTESSORI SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ABBOTT HOUSE: $5k → 9%ABBOTT HOUSE: $5k → 9%ABBOTT HOUSE: $5k → 9%ABBOTT HOUSE: $5k → 9%ABBOTT HOUSE: $5k → 9%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $1k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $1k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $1k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $1k → 17%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $1k → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $250 → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $250 → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $250 → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $250 → 17%ROOM TO GROW: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 48 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

48 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
9

Total granted

$2.8M
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+78%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WRITING REVOLUTION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $300k · revenue +184%
  • TA
    THE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $103k · revenue +49%
  • AA
    ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $75k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • WH
    WILTON HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • AT
    ATLANTIC THEATRE COMPANY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FS
    FWSF SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
9
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Christ in India Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
29/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRESH AIR FUND: $1,500,000 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR FUND+2 more: $24,950 · Recreation & SportsIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…NY TIMES SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $123,815 · OtherNY TIMES SCHOLARSHIP …NY TIMES NEEDIST CASES FUND: $25,000 · OtherWILTON ABC HOUSE: $20,000 · OtherABBOTT HOUSE: $25,000 · Other+32 more: $149,350 · Other+32 moreTHE WRITING REVOLUTION INC: $300,000 · EducationTHE WRITING R…SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $30,000 · EducationSACRED HEART …+4 more: $13,000 · EducationWILTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $76,400 · Arts & CultureALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $10,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC: $103,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $35,000 · EnvironmentWilton Land Conservation Trust: $5,750 · Environment+1 more: $1,250 · EnvironmentCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $53,000 · Food & NutritionFriends of Christ in India Inc: $30,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $13,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · International+1 more: $1,500 · International
Recreation & Sports$1,524,950Other$543,165Education$343,000Arts & Culture$161,900Environment$145,000Food & Nutrition$53,000International$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $1,500,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetTHE WRITING REVOLUTION INC: $300,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC: $103,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetWILTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $76,400 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $53,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Christ in India Inc: $30,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetABBOTT HOUSE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFUGEES FAMILY INC: $23,700 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGIANTS COMMUNITY FUND: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMARVELWOOD SCHOOL INC: $5,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWilton Land Conservation Trust: $5,750 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRAHAM WINDHAM: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPUS 118 HARLEM SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetElm City Montessori School Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDON INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECT THE ADIRONDACKS INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTURN 2 U INC dba THE LAST MILE: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE OF CARE FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH CANCER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE WRITING REVOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds WILTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Christ in India Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABBOTT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FUGEES FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds MARVELWOOD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Wilton Land Conservation Trust ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAHAM WINDHAM ↗
  • Who funds MARIN SCHOOL OF THE ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds OPUS 118 HARLEM SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abrahamson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abrahamson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wilton Historical Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Abrahamson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Abrahamson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Abrahamson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph