Skip to content
A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima at a glance

· Private foundation

A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$195kArts & Culture$179kHuman Services$162kYouth Development$88kHealth$85kRecreation & Sports$70kInternational$25kReligion$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FOCUS INC$30,000
WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC$25,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
GRASSROOTS SOCCER$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD$10,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$5,000
JAFCO CHILDREN'S ABILITY CENTER$5,000
KIDS IN CRISIS$5,000
BEST BUDDIES INTERNATIONAL$5,000
CITY OF BELLE FOURCHE POLICE DEPARTMENT$5,000
NATIONAL WOMENS PICKLEBALL FOUNDATION$5,000
BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE (BDRR)$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
SERVICE STARS INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JAFCO CHILDREN'S ABILITY CENTER: $5k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION & FOSTER CARE OPTIONS: $5k → 13%CHILDRENS PLACE AT HOME SAFE INC: $5k → 11%JAFCO CHILDREN'S ABILITY CENTER: $5k → 13%READYKIDS INC: $10k → 8%PAWS 4 LIBERTY: $5k → 11%CHILD RESCUE COALITION INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
NY
MA
OR
SD
CT
UT
VA
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$820k · 19 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
19

Total granted

$820k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+6%

Still filing today

68%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsInternationalArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FOCUS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $155k · revenue +227% · 67% of their budget
  • FO
    FELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +251%
  • KI
    KIDS IN CRISIS INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $50k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • NW
    National Women's Health Network
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -11%
  • MC
    Mercy Corps
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +21%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
2
Children in Conflict Inc

Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

Human Services
3
Partners with Families and Children Spokane

Our mission is to prevent, interrupt and repair cycles of abuse and neglect within families.Our vision is safe children, healthy families, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
4
Best Kids Inc

Best Kids, Inc is a nonprofit mentoring organization that empowers youth in foster care to build better futures, one child at a time.

Youth Development
5
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah

Big brothers big sisters of utah's vision is that all children achieve success in life. our mission is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Education
6
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
7
Children At Risk

Children At Risk (C@R) is a statewide nonprofit organization whose mission is to serve as a catalyst for change to improve the quality of life for children through strategic research, public policy analysis, education, collaboration, and…

Crime & Legal
8
The Children's Law Center

To provide legal services to indigent children in contested custody/ visitation and related cases.

Crime & Legal
9
World Childhood Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to inspire, promote, and develop solutions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.

Human Services
10
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Manitowoc County Inc

To provide children facing adversity with strong, enduring, professionally supported one on one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

—
11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.

Youth Development
12
Family & Children Services Inc

Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Crisis Inc; the most unlike its peers is Service Stars Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $86,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $50,000 · OtherKIDS IN CRISIS INCCHILDREN'S CARE HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S CARE HOSPITAL AND SCHOOLBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC: $17,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INCFRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $17,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF LUBAVITCHBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE (BDRR): $12,000 · OtherMICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSONS: $12,000 · OtherNational Women's Health Network: $15,000 · Other+14 more: $79,000 · Other+14 moreWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $190,000 · EducationWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC+1 more: $5,000 · EducationAMERICAN FOCUS INC: $155,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FOCUS INC+2 more: $6,000 · Arts & CultureFELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC: $70,000 · Recreation & SportsFELIX ORGANIZATI…GRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $65,208 · Recreation & SportsGRASSROOT SOCCER…NATIONAL WOMEN'S PICKLEBALL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH: $32,000 · Youth DevelopmentSQUASHBUSTERS INC: $24,000 · Youth DevelopmentSILVER LINING MENTORING INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentJack The Bike Man Inc: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $16,000 · InternationalBest Buddies International Inc: $15,000 · InternationalMercy Corps: $10,000 · InternationalREADYKIDS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesJAFCO Children's Ability Center Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesJewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Children's Place at Home Safe Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesPAWS 4 LIBERTY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCHILD RESCUE COALITION INC: $4,500 · Human Services
Other$314,000Education$195,000Arts & Culture$161,000Recreation & Sports$140,208Youth Development$69,000International$41,000Human Services$39,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $190,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FOCUS INC: $155,000 over 5y, 67% of budgetFELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC: $70,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetGRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $65,208 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH: $32,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S CARE HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSQUASHBUSTERS INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNational Women's Health Network: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADYKIDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJAFCO Children's Ability Center Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUtah Dine Bikeyah: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE FOUNTAIN FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSILVER LINING MENTORING INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJack The Bike Man Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Children's Place at Home Safe Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS 4 LIBERTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S PICKLEBALL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPALM BEACH SCHOOL FOR AUTISM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD RESCUE COALITION INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOTHER BROOK ARTS AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSERVICE STARS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Ibis Charities Founda…The Batchelor Foundat…Leslie L Alexander Fo…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Jewish Communal FundSilicon Valley Commun…Enterprise Holdings F…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY14.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Ibis Charities Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Child Rescue Coalition Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Silver Lining Mentoring Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich: 7% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Jack the Bike Man Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima?

Find your warmest path to A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home