· Private foundation
A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN FOCUS INC | $30,000 |
| WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| GRASSROOTS SOCCER | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD | $10,000 |
| KIDS IN CRISIS | $5,000 |
| CITY OF BELLE FOURCHE POLICE DEPARTMENT | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL WOMENS PICKLEBALL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BREAKTHROUGH T1D | $5,000 |
| JAFCO CHILDREN'S ABILITY CENTER | $5,000 |
| BEST BUDDIES INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
| BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE (BDRR) | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| SERVICE STARS INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FOCUS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $155k · revenue +227% · 67% of their budget
- FOFELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +251%
- KIKIDS IN CRISIS INC7× · 2018–2025 · $50k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- NWNational Women's Health Networkone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -11%
- TFTHE FOUNTAIN FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +175%
- MCMercy Corpsone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.
Our mission is to prevent, interrupt and repair cycles of abuse and neglect within families.Our vision is safe children, healthy families, thriving communities.
Best Kids, Inc is a nonprofit mentoring organization that empowers youth in foster care to build better futures, one child at a time.
Big brothers big sisters of utah's vision is that all children achieve success in life. our mission is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.
Children's services
Children At Risk (C@R) is a statewide nonprofit organization whose mission is to serve as a catalyst for change to improve the quality of life for children through strategic research, public policy analysis, education, collaboration, and…
To provide legal services to indigent children in contested custody/ visitation and related cases.
The mission of the foundation is to inspire, promote, and develop solutions to end the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.
To provide children facing adversity with strong, enduring, professionally supported one on one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.
Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Crisis Inc and the most unlike its peers is Service Stars Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOCUS INC ↗
- Who funds FELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOT SOCCER INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CARE HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SQUASHBUSTERS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF STAMFORD INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH ↗
- Who funds National Women's Health Network ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNTAIN FUND ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds JAFCO Children's Ability Center Inc ↗
- Who funds READYKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Utah Dine Bikeyah ↗
- Who funds SILVER LINING MENTORING INC ↗
- Who funds Jack The Bike Man Inc ↗
- Who funds VICE PRESIDENT'S RESIDENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S PICKLEBALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds Jewish Adoption and Foster Care Options Inc ↗
- Who funds The Children's Place at Home Safe Inc ↗
- Who funds PAWS 4 LIBERTY INC ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH SCHOOL FOR AUTISM INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD RESCUE COALITION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Ibis Charities Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Child Rescue Coalition Inc — 20% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc — 17% of income from government
- Silver Lining Mentoring Inc — 10% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Jack the Bike Man Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima?
Find your warmest path to A H Addington Fund Inc-Dima through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.