Skip to content
58 Partners Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

58 Partners Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$386k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$386k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$386kReligion$368kInternational$339kHuman Services$38kYouth Development$35kEducation$12kHousing & Shelter$12kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$386,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$810k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARLEY'S KIDS FOUNDATION$386,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KING'S KIDS MINNESOTA INC: $10k → 7%HEART OF FAMILIES: $6k → 9%THE REFUGEE RESPONSE: $4k → 17%BONDSERVANTS: $30k → 15%SERVING OUR NEIGHBORS MINISTRIES INC: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of 58 Partners Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 49% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 47%.

58 Partners Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 28% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
2
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
3
Kings Commission Ministries

Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…

—
4
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
5
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
6
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
7
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
8
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
9
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
10
Foreign Mission Foundation
—
11
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
12
Be Hope International
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Resource Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Charleys Kids Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLEYS KIDS FOUNDATION: $386,000 · PhilanthropyCHARLEYS KIDS FOUNDATIONHANHEE KIM WORLD MISSION CENTER INC: $312,509 · ReligionHANHEE KIM WORLD MISSION CENTER IN…Oceans of Mercy: $21,200 · ReligionOceans of Mercy+5 more: $35,600 · Religion+5 moreYOUTH WITH A MISSION WASHINGTON DC: $106,000 · OtherYOUTH WITH A MISSION WASHINGTON DC58 PARTNERS CHURCH: $86,000 · Other58 PARTNERS CHURCHYOUTH FOR CHRIST USA INC: $35,000 · OtherYOUTH FOR CHRIST USA INCMARYLAND KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $18,000 · OtherAMECET MINISTRIES: $18,000 · OtherJESUS'S CHURCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $18,000 · OtherHAITI MISSION: $17,610 · OtherKINGS PARK INTERNATIONAL CHURCH INC: $13,500 · OtherASIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $13,200 · Other+6 more: $37,695 · Other+6 moreBOND SERVANTS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSERVING OUR NEIGHBORS MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesKING KIDS MINNESOTA INC: $9,600 · Human ServicesHEARTS FOR FAMILIES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesRESOURCE CLEVELAND: $4,165 · Human ServicesBRIGHT PROSPECT: $12,000 · EducationPOMONA HOPE: $2,663 · EducationHarbor House Ministries Inc: $4,998 · Community ImprovementBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc: $2,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$386,000Religion$369,309Other$363,005Human Services$64,765Education$14,663Community Improvement$4,998Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLEYS KIDS FOUNDATION: $386,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetBOND SERVANTS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetSERVING OUR NEIGHBORS MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $13,200 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBRIGHT PROSPECT: $12,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetInternational Friendships Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetZOE INTERNATIONAL: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMINORITIES FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHEARTS FOR FAMILIES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHarbor House Ministries Inc: $4,998 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCORD MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $4,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRESOURCE CLEVELAND: $4,165 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOUTH WITH A MISSION LEBANON PA: $3,600 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPOMONA HOPE: $2,663 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charleys Kids Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Charleys Kids FoundationOH19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charleys Kids Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 58 Partners Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 58 Partners Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 58 Partners Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 58 Partners Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 58 Partners’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home