Skip to content

· Private foundation

3 Sister Non-Profit Inc 3 Sisters Non-Profit

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2020
18
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2020.

Health$21kHuman Services$4kEducation$4kAnimals$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$765International$555Philanthropy$330Housing & Shelter$196
02FY2020 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$525
Median grant
4
States reached
$22k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Denver Health$3,125
Mary Greeley Foundation$2,145
Gilbert Education Foundation$2,125
Swedish Medical Center Health One$1,614
Project Valentine$1,050
Perry Community School District (Perry Middle School)$900
Individual grant recipient$765
Hornbuckle Foundation$660
Individual grant recipient$525
Des Moines VA Hospital Medical Center$378
Little Sisters of the Poor - Sacred Heart Home$350
Youth and Shelter Services$336
RIPBEAMS$330
Friendship Ark$196
Close to Home Hospice$175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Emergency Infant Services: $480 → 15%Night Lights: $1k → 7%Night Lights: $1k → 7%Youth and Shelter Services: $336 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16k · 4 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +247% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$16k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+247%
+22%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    Denver Health
    2× · 2019–2020 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2020 · $4k
  • NL
    Night Lights Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • DR
    DUBUQUE RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • CD
    CO Dept of Education Facility Schools
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • VM
    VA Medical Center
    one grant, 2018 · $990
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Residential Services Inc

Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.

Health
2
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
3
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
4
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc

Ronald McDonald House Mountain West surrounds families with the support they need to be near and care for their seriously ill or injured children.

Health
6
Ronald McDonald House of Dallas Inc

Our mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. We support the health and well-being of seriously ill or injured children receiving treatment in the…

—
7
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis, Inc. sees a world where every family has what they need to ensure the best health outcomes for their children. They provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and…

Health
8
Ronald McDonald House of Mid-Michigan

To provide a warm & caring Home-Away-From-Home for ill children and their families.

Health
9
Nursing and Therapy Services of Colorado

To provide compassionate, comprehensive, and accessible healthcare for individuals of all ages, fostering a healthier and brighter future for every child and adult in our community. Our vision is rooted in a commitment to providing…

Health
10
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Illinois

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Illinois (RMHCCI) provides programs to support the well-being of children and provides a home away from home for families with children receiving medical care.

—
11
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
12
Carole's House of Hope

Caroles House of Hope provides transitional living for young women and mothers who have aged out of foster care or have become homeless. Our home-like environment, paired with innovative programs and services, encourages self-sufficiency…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth and Shelter Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gilbert Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Denver Health: $8,735 · OtherDenver HealthIndividual grant recipient: $3,705 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSwedish Medical Center Health One: $1,614 · OtherSwedish Medical Center Health OneDUBUQUE RESCUE MISSION: $1,425 · OtherDUBUQUE RESCUE MISSIONCO Dept of Education Facility Schools: $1,195 · OtherProject Valentine: $1,050 · OtherVA Medical Center: $990 · OtherPerry Community School District (Perry Middle School): $900 · Other+11 more: $3,444 · Other+11 moreMARY GREELEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,145 · HealthMARY GREELEY…HORNBUCKLE FOUNDATION: $960 · HealthHORNBUCKLE F…MARTHAS HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $300 · HealthMARTHAS HOUS…Craig Hospital: $133 · HealthNight Lights Inc: $2,340 · Human ServicesNight Light…Emergency Infant Services Inc: $480 · Human ServicesEmergency I…YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $336 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND S…GILBERT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,125 · PhilanthropySENSE OF SECURITY INC: $275 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDSHIP ARK INC: $196 · Housing & Shelter
Other$23,058Health$3,538Human Services$3,156Philanthropy$2,125Housing & Shelter$471

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNight Lights Inc: $2,340 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMARY GREELEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,145 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILBERT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,125 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $336 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF COLORADO: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHAS HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSENSE OF SECURITY INC: $275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $215 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP ARK INC: $196 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCraig Hospital: $133 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Night Lights Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARY GREELEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GILBERT EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HORNBUCKLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds MARTHAS HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SENSE OF SECURITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP ARK INC ↗
  • Who funds Craig Hospital ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Becker Family FoundationIA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Becker Family Foundation · Underwood Family Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 3 Sister Non-Profit Inc 3 Sisters Non-Profit funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 3 Sister Non-Profit Inc 3 Sisters Non-Profit. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 3 Sister Non-Profit Inc 3 Sisters Non-Profit’s filings →

    More from the funding graph