Skip to content
2701 Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

2701 Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Animals$18kHuman Services$10kEnvironment$6kInternational$3kHealth$2kHousing & Shelter$600Religion$500Community Improvement$300
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HERALD CHARITIES$2,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES$1,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP$1,500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,500
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS$1,500
THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC$600
TIGER HAVEN INC$500
CENTER FOR GREAT APES$500
CHABAD OF THE GROVE$500
FLORIDA KEYS WILD BIRD CENTER$500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$250
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30k · 25 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
3

Total granted

$30k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+176%

Still filing today

76%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +24%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $3k · revenue +31%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ANIMALS INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $3k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IF
    INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +17%
  • COMMUNITY INITIATIVESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $300 · revenue +176%
  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS
    one grant, 2021 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
2
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
3
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
6
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
9
Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc

The mission of the Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa a/k/a ZooTampa at Lowry Park, is to rescue, rehabilitate and care for animals.(Expanded mission on Schedule O)ZooTampa creates exceptional personalized experiences that connect…

Animals
10
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
11
Ric OBarrys Dolphin Project

For Education, Safety, Protection, Recovery, and Prevention From Cruelty for All Cetaceans Especially Dolphins

Animals
12
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Humane World for Animals Inc: $2,700 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncFRIENDS OF ANIMALS INC: $2,700 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF ANIMALS INCTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,600 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF …HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $1,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR PO…THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $1,400 · AnimalsTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEEAlley Cat Rescue Inc: $1,400 · AnimalsAlley Cat Rescue IncBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $800 · Animals+9 more: $3,050 · Animals+9 moreTHE HERALD CHARITIES INC: $6,600 · OtherTHE HERALD CHARITIES INCINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $1,250 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS…CENTER FOR THE GREAT APES: $1,000 · OtherCENTER FOR THE GREAT APESTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $850 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYPETA: $800 · OtherPETASALVATION ARMY: $600 · OtherCHABAD OF THE GROVE: $500 · OtherMiami Rescue Mission Inc: $600 · Other+5 more: $1,200 · Other+5 moreOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $1,850 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERV…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,600 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIF…THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGLADE…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,750 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,500 · ReligionMARINE MEGAFAUNA FOUNDATION: $600 · International
Animals$15,150Other$13,400Environment$4,550Human Services$2,750Health$1,500Religion$1,500International$600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HERALD CHARITIES INC: $6,600 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ANIMALS INC: $2,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $1,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $1,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Rescue Inc: $1,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE MEGAFAUNA FOUNDATION: $600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMiami Rescue Mission Inc: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Keys Wild Bird Rehabilitation Center Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIGER HAVEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANTHERA CORPORATION: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLucky Orphans Horse Rescue Inc: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarathon Wild Bird Center Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFlorida Wildlife Federation: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Batchelor Foundat…The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Batchelor Foundation IncFL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 2701 Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 2701 Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to 2701 Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to 2701 Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 2701’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home