· Private foundation
1335 Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k33 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $152k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $622k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KENOSHA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $1,010,000 |
| BETH HILLEL TEMPLE ENDOWMENT FUND | $500,000 |
| WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S HORIZONS | $260,000 |
| CARTHAGE COLLEGE | $145,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $115,000 |
| KENOSHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $105,000 |
| KENOSHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $102,000 |
| KENOSHA CHRISTMAS CHARITIES | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - PARKSIDE FOUNDATION | $55,000 |
| SHALVA INC | $35,000 |
| KENOSHA PUBLIC MUSEUMS | $28,000 |
| KENOSHA LITERACY COUNCIL | $27,000 |
| THE SHALOM CENTER | $27,000 |
| THE WOMEN'S HOME | $25,000 |
| BIG BUTTERNUT LAKE PARK | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $589k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $624k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KCKENOSHA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC KENOSHA HISTORY CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +444% · 76% of their budget
CARTHAGE COLLEGE5× · 2020–2024 · $370k · revenue +7%- WAWOMEN AND CHILDREN'S HORIZONS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $302k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- LMLUCK MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSEone grant, 2021 · $8k
- TCTEXAS CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT TEEN PREGNANCY INCone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -33%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.
The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…
Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.
The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…
We believe every child in america should have equal opportunity and resources to engage in a quality education. by partnering with teachers and students in under-resourced schools, we provide the support needed to create equitable learning…
To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.
The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wilsons Image College Scholarship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KENOSHA COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC KENOSHA HISTORY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CARTHAGE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
- Who funds KENOSHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KENOSHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds KENOSHA CHRISTMAS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PARKSIDE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds KENOSHA LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Houston Area Women's Center ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KENOSHA INC ↗
- Who funds KENOSHA ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Assessment Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY FUTURES OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KENOSHA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT TEEN PREGNANCY INC ↗
- Who funds Presbyterian School ↗
- Who funds KENOSHA COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds RED TENT FUND ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCARE DC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: John & Ruth Kloss Charitable Tr Uma · Kenosha Community Foundation · Mary Frost Ashley Charitable Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Trustmark Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Otto Bremer Trust · Houston Endowment Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 1335 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to 1335 Foundation?
Find your warmest path to 1335 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.