Skip to content

· Public charity

100 Women Strong Ohio Inc

100 WOMEN STRONG OHIO INC provides support to charities in need for ohio men, women and children.

$201k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $170k
$16,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$53k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST GLANCE STUDENT CENTER$35,000
HARMONY HOUSE INC$35,000
CHAIR-ITY$16,700
EMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION$16,700
FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC$16,700
EDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC$16,700
REACHING ABOVE HOPELESSNESS & BROKENNESS MINISTRIES INC$16,700
AKRON SNOW ANGELS$16,700
BEN CURTIS FAMILY FOUNDATION$7,500
THE WELL CDC$7,500
BLOSSOM HILL INC$7,500
HOPE RECOVERY COMMUNITY$7,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC: $17k → 17%EMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION: $17k → 17%AKRON SNOW ANGELS: $17k → 13%CHAIR-ITY: $17k → 17%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $17k → 13%BLOSSOM HILL INC: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Residential Home for the Developmentally Disabled Inc

Built on a foundation of compassion and integrity, rhdd is dedicated to supporting individuals with a disability, to live and work in their communities.safe in a family environment, individuals are empowered to achieve personal and…

—
2
His Helping Hands Ministries

Provide safe housing and training to women who were victims of addiction,sex trafficking, abuse, homelesness or previously incarcerated.

Religion
3
Grace to Grow

We provide a recovery community that includes outpatient treatment and community support. Providing a hand-up, not a hand out through collaborative partnerships, housing and support services.

Health
4
Summit Housing Development Corp

Summit housing delevopment corporation (shdc) started in 1992 as a private, non-profit corporation with the purpose of delevoping, acquiring, and managing housing for those with developmental disabilities.

Housing & Shelter
5
Housing for Hope

Housing programs

Housing & Shelter
6
House of Hope for Recovery Inc

Rehabilitation of adult alcoholics and drug addicts.

—
7
Serenity Consultants Inc

Serenity recovery network provides safe affordable housing for men and women recovering from alcoholism and drug addiction.

Health
8
Sunstone Life Inc

To provide safe, structured housing for individuals living with substance use disorder while working closely with them to rebuild their lives as stable, productive adults.

Housing & Shelter
9
His Will Homes Inc

His will homes provides direct services for mentally impaired individuals.

Human Services
10
Elizabeth Seton Housing Corporation

Elizabeth Seton Housing Corporation provides housing for adults with developmental disabilities who have complex support needs in small residential home environments. The Corporation is operated in connection with the mission of St. Joseph…

Human Services
11
Hiawatha Homes Inc

Provide residential, in-home, and community-based choices for people with disabilities.

—
12
Horizon House Inc

Horizon house supports our neighbors experiencing homelessness with integrated, comprehensive services so they can secure and maintain housing.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Summit County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ben Curtis Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
1/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC: $16,700 · Human ServicesEDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INCAkron Snow Angels: $16,700 · Human ServicesAkron Snow AngelsFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $16,700 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INCEMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION: $16,700 · Human ServicesEMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATIONCHAIR-ITY: $16,700 · Human ServicesCHAIR-ITYBLOSSOM HILL INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesBLOSSOM HILL INCHARMONY HOUSE INC: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterHARMONY HOUSE INCFIRST GLANCE STUDENT CENTER INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIRST GLANCE STUDEN…REACHING ABOVE HOPELESSNESS & BROKENNESS MINISTRIES INC: $16,700 · ReligionREACHING …HOPE RECOVERY COMMUNITY: $7,500 · OtherBEN CURTIS FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherTHE WELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7,500 · Community Improvement
Human Services$91,000Housing & Shelter$35,000Youth Development$35,000Religion$16,700Other$15,000Community Improvement$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARMONY HOUSE INC: $35,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetFIRST GLANCE STUDENT CENTER INC: $35,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetEDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC: $16,700 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetREACHING ABOVE HOPELESSNESS & BROKENNESS MINISTRIES INC: $16,700 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAkron Snow Angels: $16,700 over 1y, 16% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC: $16,700 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetEMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION: $16,700 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCHAIR-ITY: $16,700 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBLOSSOM HILL INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE RECOVERY COMMUNITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBEN CURTIS FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community FoundationOH21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc · Gar Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · Tuscora Park Health & Wellness Foundation · The Welty Family Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · Gpd Group Employees Foundation Inc · Community West Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 100 Women Strong Ohio Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 100 Women Strong Ohio Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 100 Women Strong Ohio Inc?

    Find your warmest path to 100 Women Strong Ohio Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $150k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 100 Women Strong Ohio’s filings →

    More from the funding graph