Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION

ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION (Texas) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $243,495 to it, the largest being AUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION ($75,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 66% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$900k
Funders on record
14
Grants received
$243k
Net assets
$386k
8/14 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 15%
01What it does

What Zilker Botanical Garden Conservancy Non-Profit Corporation does

Mission

The mission of the zilker botanical garden conservancy is to cultivate community and foster life-long learning that inspires an appreciation of the botanical world.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. General programs - general programs at zilker botanical garden conservancy provide community engagement and educational opportunities for visitors of all ages. Community engagement programs include public events such as bands in bloom, wellness offerings like yoga, seasonal installations such as the woodland faerie trail, and seasonal celebrations including yule in the garden. Educational programs include horticultural workshops, guided tours, docent-led school field trips, and hands-on learning experiences such as dino days and roots and wings. These programs promote environmental stewardship, expand access to nature-based education, and foster community connection within a public garden setting.

    $231,592 spentof which $2,000 as grants$54,043 earned by the program
    38% of program spending
  2. Admissions - the admissions program supports public access to zilker botanical garden through paid entry for non-members, generating a primary source of earned revenue for the conservancy. As a nonprofit partner operating within a public-private model with the city of austin, admissions revenue helps sustain daily operations, guest services, and the ongoing care and improvement of the garden. Admissions operations include front gate and gift shop staffing to ensure a welcoming and accessible experience for all visitors. This program enables continued access to a high-quality public garden experience for the community.

    $139,008 spent$353,689 earned by the program
    23% of program spending
  3. Garden improvements - the garden improvements program supports the preservation, enhancement, and long-term sustainability of zilker botanical garden through direct investments in the garden grounds and facilities. This includes capital improvements, landscape enhancements, infrastructure projects, and contracted services that improve the visitor experience and support horticultural care. Funds may also support staff and programmatic roles directly tied to garden operations, volunteer coordination, and educational programming. These efforts ensure the continued health, accessibility, and quality of the garden as a public resource.

    $104,282 spent$154,041 earned by the program
    17% of program spending
  4. Other programs - arts and culture, community engagement, education, wellness, gift shop, memorials/bricks/benches.

    $131,952 spent$16,989 earned by the program
    22% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $606,834.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($147k) Expenses 100 ($84k) Net assets 100 ($142k)2020 Revenue 195 ($288k) Expenses 296 ($247k) Net assets 128 ($182k)2021 Revenue 380 ($560k) Expenses 473 ($395k) Net assets 245 ($348k)2022 Revenue 492 ($725k) Expenses 699 ($584k) Net assets 345 ($489k)2023 Revenue 648 ($954k) Expenses 1057 ($883k) Net assets 395 ($560k)2024 Revenue 672 ($990k) Expenses 1315 ($1.1M) Net assets 342 ($485k)2025 Revenue 611 ($900k) Expenses 1196 ($999k) Net assets 272 ($386k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (611)Expenses (1196)Net assets (272)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $199k to $386k (+94%).

$149k
$199k
$386k
$569k
$728k
$579k
$626k
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 17% · 2023 0% · 2024 0% · 2025 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

13% of ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$64k
’19
$40k
’20
$166k
’21
$141k
’22
$71k
’23
−$109k
’24
−$99k
’25
6.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Holly Hawk

Executive director

Board chair

Leah Romero

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

2019202020212022202320242025
Listed16262623161621
Joined·+12+3+0+2+8+6
No longer listed·233981
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 5 funders, grant income rose $10k → $21k.

7 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 66% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 31% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

86% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION.

31%
largest funder
54%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 58% · 2021 51% · 2022 69% · 2023 47% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 57% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

66% of ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $83k that is directly attributable, 52% of it comes from funders outside Texas, across 4 states.

IL
NY
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $160k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−11% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve6.8mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)35% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

61% of spending goes to programs.

Program 61%Management 33%Fundraising 6%

Governance

20
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

71%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION?
ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION (Texas) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $243,495 to it, the largest being AUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION ($75,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 66% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION have?
IRS filings report 14 organizations giving $243,495 in grants to ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION?
AUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $75,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ZILKER BOTANICAL GARDEN CONSERVANCY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Zilker Botanical Garden Conservancy Non-Profit →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 14 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing