Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

North Carolina · Nonprofit

Wild South

Wild South (North Carolina) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $541,735 to it, the largest being NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ($182,527). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$431k
Revenue FY2024
14
Funders on record
$542k
Grants received
$315k
Net assets
4/14 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 54%

Against its field

Wild South runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,260 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin31% · top quartile
Months of reserve7.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,260 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($337k) Expenses 100 ($242k) Net assets 100 ($126k)2018 Revenue 93 ($314k) Expenses 127 ($307k) Net assets 105 ($132k)2019 Revenue 81 ($271k) Expenses 106 ($256k) Net assets 117 ($147k)2020 Revenue 60 ($201k) Expenses 101 ($244k) Net assets 83 ($104k)2021 Revenue 58 ($196k) Expenses 75 ($181k) Net assets 95 ($119k)2022 Revenue 40 ($133k) Expenses 59 ($142k) Net assets 88 ($111k)2023 Revenue 68 ($230k) Expenses 65 ($158k) Net assets 145 ($182k)2024 Revenue 128 ($431k) Expenses 123 ($298k) Net assets 251 ($315k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (128)Expenses (123)Net assets (251)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 7% · 2019 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

56% of Wild South’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,616 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$94k
17
$6k
18
$15k
19
$43k
20
$16k
21
$9k
22
$72k
23
$133k
24
7.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $60k → $123k.

4 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)34% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Wild South’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Wild South leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 79%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

81% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Wild South.

34%
largest funder
79%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 67% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 55% · 2022 49% · 2023 41%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of Wild South's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 29% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Wild South draws 70% of its grant income from funders outside North Carolina, across 7 states in all.

MT
OR
CT
CA
VA
NC
AL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
21
22
23
North Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $186k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 14 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding Wild South receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.1M on record.

Federal$1.1M
grants $1.1Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$1.1M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Wild South

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In North Carolina

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

82% of spending goes to programs.

Program 82%Management 14%Fundraising 4%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

89%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 3 states

TN
NC
AL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Wild South: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Wild South?
Wild South (North Carolina) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $541,735 to it, the largest being NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ($182,527). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Wild South have?
IRS filings report 14 organizations giving $541,735 in grants to Wild South, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Wild South?
NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $182,527 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Wild South find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 14funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing