Skip to content

Virginia · Public charity

Southern Environmental Law Center

The mission of the SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER is to protect the basic right to clean air, clean water, and a livable climate; to preserve our region's natural treasures and rich biodiversity; and to provide a healthy environment for all.

$86k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$67k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$23,750
Organizations funded a year
1 to 6
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$281M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Southern Environmental Law Center funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$67k75%
FY20241$15k0%
FY20233$75k33%
FY20222$30k100%
FY20216$129k83%
FY20202$46k50%
FY20195$100k60%
FY20183$25k67%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$615kCrime & Legal$500kEducation$40kCommunity Improvement$24kCivil Rights$14k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Virginia Wilderness Committee$112,238623%
Appalachian Voices$72,50021%
Georgia Forestwatch Inc$58,59246%
Southern Alliance for Clean Energy$46,60011%
North Carolina Conservation Network$40,90011%
Wild South$40,000112%
The University of North Carolina at Asheville Foundation Inc$33,71910%
Protect Our Aquifer$30,00014%
Virginia Organizing Inc$30,00010%
Cherokee Forest Voices Inc$25,0001n/a
Show all 24 grantees
All grantees of Southern Environmental Law Center by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Virginia Wilderness Committee$112,238623%
Appalachian Voices$72,50021%
Georgia Forestwatch Inc$58,59246%
Southern Alliance for Clean Energy$46,60011%
North Carolina Conservation Network$40,90011%
Wild South$40,000112%
The University of North Carolina at Asheville Foundation Inc$33,71910%
Protect Our Aquifer$30,00014%
Virginia Organizing Inc$30,00010%
Cherokee Forest Voices Inc$25,0001n/a
Alabama Rivers Alliance Inc$25,00016%
North Carolinians for Passenger Rail$23,750140%
Conservation Alabama$20,0001n/a
Propel Atl Inc$20,00012%
Coosa Riverkeeper Inc$20,00017%
Asian American Advocacy Fund Inc$13,50011%
The Partnership Project Action Fund$12,50010%
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$10,0001n/a
North Carolina Central University Foundation Inc$10,00010%
Laura Hodge$8,3001n/a
University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc$8,10010%
Virginia Conservation Network$6,66711%
Sierra Club$6,66710%
Cahaba River Society Inc$5,78511%

Where it is load-bearing

Southern Environmental Law Center supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 20 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVirginia Wilderness Committee: $112,238 over 6y, 23% of budgetAppalachian Voices: $72,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGeorgia Forestwatch Inc: $58,592 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetSouthern Alliance for Clean Energy: $46,600 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNorth Carolina Conservation Network: $40,900 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWild South: $40,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetThe University of North Carolina at Asheville Foundation Inc: $33,719 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetProtect Our Aquifer: $30,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetVirginia Organizing Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAlabama Rivers Alliance Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetNorth Carolinians for Passenger Rail: $23,750 over 1y, 40% of budgetPropel Atl Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCoosa Riverkeeper Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetAsian American Advocacy Fund Inc: $13,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Partnership Project Action Fund: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Carolina Central University Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc: $8,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVirginia Conservation Network: $6,667 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSierra Club: $6,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCahaba River Society Inc: $5,785 over 1y, 1.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgCA20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Energy Foundation · Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated · United States Energy Foundation · Westwind Foundation · Stephens Foundation · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Southern Environmental Law Center with peer funders

About Southern Environmental Law Center

How much does Southern Environmental Law Center give?
Southern Environmental Law Center reported 4 itemized grants totaling $67,250, out of $86,416 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 6 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Southern Environmental Law Center fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (52%), Crime & Legal (42%), Education (3%).
Who are Southern Environmental Law Center's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Virginia Wilderness Committee ($112k), Appalachian Voices ($73k), Georgia Forestwatch Inc ($59k).
Does Southern Environmental Law Center fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Southern Environmental Law Center?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Patagoniaorg, Charlottesville Area Community Foundation, The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc.
Where is Southern Environmental Law Center based?
Southern Environmental Law Center is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Southern Environmental Law Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph