· Public charity
Mht Housing Inc
To preserve and extend affordable housing in michigan through the acquisition and operation of multifamily residential real estate for low and very low-income tenants.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $368,589 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $515,353 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $146,764 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $237k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $117k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION | $65,000 |
| CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL | $51,884 |
| DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS | $42,065 |
| DETROIT CATHOLIC PASTORAL ALLIANCE | $32,500 |
| CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES | $27,695 |
| ART FOR GOD'S SAKE | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL WOMEN'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING NETWORK | $20,000 |
| REGINA HIGH SCHOOL | $16,500 |
| CHURCH OF MESSIAH HOUSING CORPORATION | $15,000 |
| EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES INC | $14,445 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION | $14,000 |
| LIBERTY TEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH | $10,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE | $10,000 |
| CREA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HAVEN HOUSE | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 65% of Mht Housing Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 34% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $203k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDETROIT CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC5× · 2020–2024 · $244k
- EREMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES INC3× · 2022–2024 · $96k
YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit3× · 2021–2023 · $83k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- CCCORE COMMUNITY PARTNERSone grant, 2021 · $3.0M · revenue +1% · 94% of their budget
- MHMHT HOUSING IV INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $740k · revenue +166%
- BLBACKER LANDSCAPING INC2× · 2022–2023 · $23k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…
Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.
Fair Housing Center of Metropolitan Detroits FHCMD mission is to ensure access to housing without discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex including sexual orientation and gender identity, or familial status,and…
Community housing management corp. (chmc) provides management and administrative services to these related organizations: covenant place foundation (cpf), covenant place senior center, inc. (cpsc), covenant place i, llc (cp1), covenant…
The mission of community housing initiatives, inc. is to leverage and maximize opportunities for vibrant and resilient communities.
The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.
To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing
Chn's mission is to leverage the power of affordable housing to improve lives and communities.
Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.
Our mission is "empowering individuals and communities by helping people, buy, fix and keep their homes". to further this work, we provide homeownership education and advising as well as residential community lending programs to families…
Community housing association, inc. provided affordable housing for seniors, as well as adults with qualifying mobility impairments, in a vibrant, safe, and supportive community.
Housing Partnerships, Inc creates great communities through direct investments and partnerships.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Service Organization and the most unlike its peers is Liberty Temple Senior Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CORE COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds MHT HOUSING IV INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit ↗
- Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE DETROIT CATHOLIC PASTORAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Center for Independence through Conductive Education Inc ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CHURCH OF THE MESSIAH HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds U-SNAP-BAC INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · Priority Health Total Health Foundation · Catholic Foundation of Michigan · The Carls Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · Flagstar Foundation Inc · Comerica Charitable Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · Enterprise Community Partners Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mht Housing Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mht Housing Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mht Housing Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.