· Private foundation
Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $59k
- $10k–50k55 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k4 grants · $284k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DONORSCHOOSEORG | $133,625 |
| THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND | $50,000 |
| TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE | $50,000 |
| ASIA PACIFIC CULTURAL CENTER | $50,000 |
| MULTICULTURAL CHILD & FAMILY HOPE CENTER | $35,000 |
| ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE CO | $35,000 |
| SANTA'S CASTLE | $32,000 |
| TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY CHAPLAINCY | $32,000 |
| GOODWILL OF THE OLYMPICS & RAINIER REGION | $30,000 |
| SIBLING STRONG | $30,000 |
| PUYALLUP VALLEY ST FRANCIS HOUSE | $30,000 |
| TACOMA PARKS FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| OUR LADY QUEEN OF HEAVEN CHURCH | $25,000 |
| BLOODWORKS NORTHWEST | $25,000 |
| GREATER LAKES MENTAL HEALTHCARE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
131 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2025, 79 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $194k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DDONORSCHOOSEORG8× · 2017–2025 · $910k · revenue +24%
- GMGreater Metro Parks Foundation dba Tacoma Parks Foundation8× · 2018–2025 · $208k · revenue +95%
- RFRAINIER FOOTHILLS WELLNESS FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- EFELISEO FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $62k · revenue -1%
- CRCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
- CPCLOVER PARK SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2019 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved
Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.
Parent trust for washington children creates lasting change and hope for the future by promoting safe, healthy families and communities.
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.
Bike Works promotes the bicycle as a vehicle for change to empower youth and build resilient communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cares of Washington and the most unlike its peers is Trufant Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
165 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 165 of the 229 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds Greater Metro Parks Foundation dba Tacoma Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds Nourish Pierce County ↗
- Who funds RAINIER FOOTHILLS WELLNESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Tears Foundation ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF TACOMA ↗
- Who funds DIABETES ASSOC OF PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds A STEP AHEAD IN PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CAMP KOREY ↗
- Who funds Tacoma Community House ↗
- Who funds DEGREES OF CHANGE ↗
- Who funds PUSH for Dreams ↗
- Who funds GREATER LAKES MENTAL HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds SIBLING STRONG ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds Asia Pacific Cultural Center ↗
- Who funds Rebuilding Together South Sound ↗
- Who funds Cancer Pathways ↗
- Who funds TACID ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL CHILD AND FAMILY HOPE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HELPING HAND HOUSE ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED MINISTRIES OF TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TACOMA PIERCE COUNTY CHAPLAINCY ↗
- Who funds R MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP ↗
- Who funds ZEE SPEED ↗
- Who funds Our Sisters House ↗
- Who funds Community Connection Place ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF PENINSULA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · The Bamford Foundation · Woodworth Family Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · Multicare Health System · Heidner Marco J Char Trust · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Korum for Kids Foundation · Forest Foundation · Sequoia Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- A Family for Every Child — 33% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Western Rivers Conservancy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine?
Find your warmest path to Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.