Loading…
Loading…
New York · Nonprofit
THE SARATOGA HOSPITAL (New York) is funded by 19 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $16,121,010 in grants to it, the largest being SARATOGA CARE INC ($7,782,428). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE SARATOGA HOSPITAL runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 662 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 662 health nonprofits over $100M, FY2017
$460k from 4 funders in 2024, up from $3.9M and 2 in 2017.
5 of 19 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of THE SARATOGA HOSPITAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
THE SARATOGA HOSPITAL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 99% · 2018 99% · 2019 98% · 2020 70% · 2021 100% · 2022 98% · 2023 52% · 2024 95% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
27% of THE SARATOGA HOSPITAL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 42% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
THE SARATOGA HOSPITAL is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from New York funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 19 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
92% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 14 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2017 (financials across 2017–2017), and the filings of 19funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing