· Private foundation
The Robert and Lisa Moser Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of THE ROBERT AND LISA MOSER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k23 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $194k
- $250k+4 grants · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNION COLLEGE | $600,000 |
| DOUBLE H RANCH | $487,000 |
| THE MESIVTA HIGH SCHOOL OF GREATER | $250,000 |
| SIENA COLLEGE | $250,000 |
| SPAC | $35,000 |
| SARATOGA AUTOMOBILE MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| THE CHEVRA INC | $25,000 |
| THE TOWN OF GREENFIELD FOOD PANTRY | $24,000 |
| SARATOGA CENTRAL CATHOLIC | $20,000 |
| ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ST CLEMENTS SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| THE LOGAN STRONG FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| SARATOGA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE FLOWER AND FRUIT MISSION SARATO | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $187k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $357k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SUSIENA UNIVERSITY3× · 2022–2024 · $360k · revenue +8%
- TCThe Chevra Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +16%
- HOHIVE OF HOPE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- SRSaratoga Regional YMCAgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +40%
- TSTHE SARATOGA HOSPITALone grant, 2023 · $500k
- MHMESIVTA HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $125k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
Conducts fundraising and other recreational activities on behalf of individuals with developmental disabilities in saratoga county, new york.
We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.
Housing and programs for sick children and thier families.
The louis s. wolk jcc of greater rochester is deeply rooted in and committed to celebrating jewish traditions and values. we welcome the community at large to join together for exceptional events and activities that establish lifelong…
In 1984, saratoga bridges opened the first accessible community-based home in the county for people with developmental disabilities. subsequently, our residential program has grown tremendously. our goal is to teach residents to become…
None
This healthcare hospitality house provides a "home away from home" accomodations to patients and families of patients who are receiving medical care in central new york.
The organization supports a wide range of programs of benefit to everyone who lives, works, and plays in saratoga county, ny.
We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.st. peter's health partners medical associates is a member of st.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Double H Hole in the Woods Ranch Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Little Club 1896 Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds Saratoga Regional YMCA ↗
- Who funds THE SARATOGA HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds SIENA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY ↗
- Who funds The Chevra Inc ↗
- Who funds HIVE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Saratoga Automobile Museum ↗
- Who funds Logan Strong Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CATIE HOCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BALLER DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SARATOGA SPONSOR-A-SCHOLAR ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISABILITY SERVICESINC ↗
- Who funds COCOA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE WESLEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Dake Foundation for Children ↗
- Who funds THE ADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds SARATOGA PLAN INC ↗
- Who funds JAKE'S HELP FROM HEAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLES R WOOD THEATER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation · The Mitzen Foundation Inc · Neil Jane William Estelle Golub Family Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Adirondack Trust Company Community Fund · The Swyer Family Foundation Inc · Wsb Family Foundation · Alfred Z Solomon Testamentary Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Hannah M Adler Testamentary Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Robert and Lisa Moser Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Robert and Lisa Moser Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Robert and Lisa Moser Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.