Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Virginia · Nonprofit

THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS

THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (Virginia) receives grants from 38 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,362,548 to it, the largest being ALEXANDER MCCAUSLAND CHARITABLE ($1,768,060). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.2M
Revenue FY2025
38
Funders on record
$3.4M
Grants received
$5.5M
Net assets
24/38 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 53%

Against its field

THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS's funding base is broadening — from 6 funders to 20 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−19% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 606 animals nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($913k) Expenses 100 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($3.7M)2018 Revenue 300 ($2.7M) Expenses 120 ($1.3M) Net assets 138 ($5.2M)2019 Revenue 135 ($1.2M) Expenses 120 ($1.3M) Net assets 140 ($5.3M)2020 Revenue 157 ($1.4M) Expenses 119 ($1.3M) Net assets 157 ($5.9M)2021 Revenue 134 ($1.2M) Expenses 116 ($1.2M) Net assets 165 ($6.2M)2022 Revenue 161 ($1.5M) Expenses 122 ($1.3M) Net assets 141 ($5.3M)2023 Revenue 112 ($1.0M) Expenses 128 ($1.4M) Net assets 134 ($5.0M)2024 Revenue 176 ($1.6M) Expenses 137 ($1.4M) Net assets 143 ($5.4M)2025 Revenue 136 ($1.2M) Expenses 139 ($1.5M) Net assets 147 ($5.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (136)Expenses (139)Net assets (147)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 0% · 2019 1% · 2020 1% · 2021 13% · 2022 32% · 2023 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

87% of THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (74% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,654 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$141k
17
$1.5M
18
$33k
19
$179k
20
$3k
21
$183k
22
$330k
23
$167k
24
$229k
25
1.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 20 funders, grant income rose $150k → $542k.

10 of 38 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $51k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Mountain View Humane). These are real filings, and they are not money THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS raised.

From the IRS filings of THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 38 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 53% of grant income and the top three 73%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

53%
largest funder
73%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 93% · 2018 60% · 2019 66% · 2020 35% · 2021 50% · 2022 51% · 2023 39%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

63% of THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS draws 91% of its grant income from funders outside Virginia, across 14 states in all.

ID
IL
NY
NV
NJ
CT
CA
KY
VA
TN
NC
AL
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Virginia out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $624k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 38 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

82% of spending goes to programs.

Program 82%Management 9%Fundraising 9%

Governance

19
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

73%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Mountain View Humane · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS?
THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS (Virginia) receives grants from 38 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,362,548 to it, the largest being ALEXANDER MCCAUSLAND CHARITABLE ($1,768,060). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS have?
IRS filings report 38 organizations giving $3,362,548 in grants to THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, 24 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS?
ALEXANDER MCCAUSLAND CHARITABLE is the largest funder on record, with $1,768,060 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 38funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing