Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Muse Family Foundation Co Elizabeth Muse

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of MUSE FAMILY FOUNDATION CO ELIZABETH MUSE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$220k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHANCELOR ASA RICE FUND ELIZ MARTIN$1,000
WEST END CENTER FOR YOUTH$500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CHARLOTTESVILLE$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$500
ADULT CARE CENTER$500
ROANOKE VALLEY SPCA$500
CENTER IN THE SQUARE$500
HUNTERS FOR THE HUNGRY - ROANOKE$500
OPERATION SMILE$500
BRADLEY FREE CLINIC$500
BOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT$500
SOUTHWEST VA WILDLIFE CENTER - ROANOKE$350
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE VALLEYS$250
MILL MOUNTAIN THEATRE$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROANOKE WOMENS FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%ROANOKE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $100 → 8%RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $100 → 20%FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $100 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
NY
MA
IA
PA
CO
VA
MD
NM
AR
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$91k · 54 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

54 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
43

Total granted

$91k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+38%

Still filing today

41%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsHealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    Roanoke Womens Foundation
    2× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue ×4,319
  • BF
    BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +99%
  • TR
    THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SO
    SCHOOL OF EDUCATION HUMAN DEVELOPME
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • AT
    AGRARIAN TRUST FOR SW VA AGRARIAN C
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • RC
    RED CROSS - VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2022 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
3
Alliance for the Shenandoah Valley

Alliance for the shenandoah valley informs and engages people to protect the natural resources, cultural heritages, and rural character of our region.

Community Improvement
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
6
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

7
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
10
United States Endowment for Forestry

The endowment works collaboratively with partners in the public and private sectors to advance systemic, transformative, and sustainable change for the health and vitality of the nation's working forests and forest reliant communities.

Environment
11
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
12
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr14%29%20–35yr15%22%35–55yr15%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%11%5–10yr18%7%10–20yr14%32%20–35yr15%17%35–55yr15%34%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/47
the rest of the field
13%
6,445/50,421

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
38/46
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHANCELOR ASA RICE FUND — $6,250 · OtherCHANCELOR ASA RICE FUNDCENTER IN THE SQUARE — $4,100 · OtherCENTER IN THE SQUAREBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC — $3,550 · OtherCOMMUNITY FND OF WESTERN VA — $3,000 · OtherCHANCELLOR ASA RICE FUND — $3,000 · OtherCHANCELOR ASA RICE FUND ELIZ MARTIN — $3,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $2,500 · OtherADULT CARE CENTER — $2,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CHARLOTTESVIL — $2,350 · Other+65 more — $40,250 · Other+65 moreTHE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $2,850 · AnimalsTHE ROANOKE…LIVING WITH WOLVES LTD — $2,600 · AnimalsLIVING WITH…AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $1,850 · AnimalsAFRICAN WIL…VIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC — $1,300 · AnimalsVIRGINIA HU…LEAGUE FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION INC — $1,200 · AnimalsLEAGUE FOR …+1 more — $100 · AnimalsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,100 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC — $1,850 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC — $1,400 · International+1 more — $100 · InternationalENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $2,000 · EnvironmentLAND SAVERS UNITED — $1,350 · EnvironmentBOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT — $750 · EnvironmentPATHFINDERS FOR GREENWAY INC — $500 · EnvironmentThe Spikenard Farm Inc — $500 · Environment+2 more — $200 · EnvironmentRoanoke Womens Foundation — $4,176 · Human Services+3 more — $300 · Human ServicesFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA — $2,100 · Food & NutritionMILL MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE CO INC DBA MILL MOUNTAIN THEATRE — $1,750 · Arts & CultureGRANDIN THEATRE FOUNDATION INC — $100 · Arts & CultureTAUBMAN MUSEUM OF ART — $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$70,500Animals$9,900International$5,450Environment$5,300Human Services$4,476Food & Nutrition$2,100Arts & Culture$1,950

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC — $3,550 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $2,850 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING WITH WOLVES LTD — $2,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetARTISANS CENTER OF VIRGINIA INC — $2,225 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA — $2,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC — $1,850 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $1,850 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAPPLE RIDGE FARM INC — $1,850 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY — $1,850 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMILL MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE CO INC DBA MILL MOUNTAIN THEATRE — $1,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $1,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLAND SAVERS UNITED — $1,350 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC — $1,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEAGUE FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION INC — $1,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Cross School — $1,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEARLYSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY — $900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT — $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPATHFINDERS FOR GREENWAY INC — $500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE VALLEYS INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Spikenard Farm Inc — $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Virginia Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRANDIN THEATRE FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHIPLEY SCHOOL — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENDICOTT COLLEGE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAUBMAN MUSEUM OF ART — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY TRUST — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Roanoke Womens Foundation
  • Who funds BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC
  • Who funds THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds LIVING WITH WOLVES LTD
  • Who funds ARTISANS CENTER OF VIRGINIA INC
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC
  • Who funds APPLE RIDGE FARM INC
  • Who funds CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY
  • Who funds MILL MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE CO INC DBA MILL MOUNTAIN THEATRE
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds LAND SAVERS UNITED
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC
  • Who funds LEAGUE FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION INC
  • Who funds North Cross School

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Serving Western VirginiaVA38.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Evelyn F James Foundation · Edgar a Thurman Fdn Children Nect · Cartledge Charitable Foundation Inc · Cp & Mg Lunsford Tuw · The Beirne Carter Foundation · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · The Ceres Foundation Inc · The Helen C Cobbs Foundation · Sam & Marion Golden Helping Hand Foundation · Farrell Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Muse Family Foundation Co Elizabeth Muse funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Chesapeake Bay Trust100% of income from government
  • Endicott College1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph