· Private foundation
Robertson Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of ROBERTSON FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $512k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $313k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EASTLAKE COMMUNITY CHURCH | $200,000 |
| FRANKIE LEMMON FOUNDATION | $63,000 |
| RENEWANATION | $50,000 |
| SPCA OF MARTINSVILLE HENRY CO | $39,169 |
| RESTORATION HOUSING | $30,000 |
| CARILION FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| SMITH MOUNTAIN LAKE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| MILL MOUNTAIN ZOO | $25,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FRANKLIN CO | $21,000 |
| HEALING STRIDES OF VIRGINIA | $20,000 |
| ESTEAMED COFFEE | $18,468 |
| RENICK COMMUNITY CENTER | $15,125 |
| GODS PIT CREW | $15,000 |
| LOCAL OFFICE ON AGING | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $821k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
90 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 55 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
FRANKIE LEMMON FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2025 · $278k · revenue +242%- RRENEWANATION5× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +42%
- HSHEALING STRIDES OF VIRGINIA8× · 2018–2025 · $168k · revenue +100%
Funded once
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE SWVAone grant, 2024 · $32k
- SPSECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $25k
- THTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +400%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.
The center provides religious, educational, and charitable services including distributing clothing, refreshments, toys, gifts and religious instruction to the homeless and low income citizens of the community.
Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.
SWVA Wildlife Center's mission is to conserve Virginia's wildlife through rehabilitation and release while teaching care and respect of native species. We advocate for the protection of wildlife and wild places to ensure these magnificent…
Provide a structured, supportive, supervised and enrichment environment for the elderly at a low cost to the participants and their families.
The mission of WNC Lighthouse Inc is Changing lives, by being a light for Christ our Lord. Our vision is To be fully devoted to Jesus Christ, by opening our arms and providing Christian services to the underseved children, adults and…
Provide food & other holiday gifts to qualifying needy families in rockbridge county, lexington & buena vista, virginia
To provide safe emergency and transitional shelter throughout the New River Valley connecting families with supportive services that empower them to make behavioral changes that promote self sufficiency and stability.
Our mission is to reduce the numbers of children in the foster care system through adoption outreach education recruitment and support. We seek to increase permanency opportunities for Virginias waiting children. Additionally we aim to…
Rockbridge Recovery supports individuals, families, and communities touched by addictive behaviors through support from peers, prevention, and education.
Habitat for Humanity Virginia provides support to Virginia affiliates so that they can build or facilitate affordable housing by offering advocacy, organizational development, funding, and resource development
To provide assistance to improve the quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities, mental illness or substance abuse.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Virginia's Blue Ridge Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRANKIE LEMMON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RENEWANATION ↗
- Who funds HEALING STRIDES OF VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds GODS PIT CREW INC ↗
- Who funds RENICK COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE CENTER CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF VIRGINIA INC DBA MILL MOUNTAIN ZOO ↗
- Who funds ADULT CARE CENTER OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds RX DRUG ACCESS PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS SERVICE DOGS ↗
- Who funds Smith Mt Lake Christian Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ROANOKE VALLEY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds LOCAL OFFICE ON AGING ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF FRANKLIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INC ↗
- Who funds Roanoke Area Ministries ↗
- Who funds CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds PURPOSE OF GOD ANNEX OUTREACH CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · United Way of Virginia's Blue Ridge Inc · Edgar a Thurman Fdn Children Nect · Cartledge Charitable Foundation Inc · Carilion Medical Center · Sam & Marion Golden Helping Hand Foundation · The Newbern Foundation · Powell Charitable Foundation · The Helen C Cobbs Foundation · James a Meador Foundation · Elbert H Evelyn J & Karen H Waldron Charitable Foundation · The Allstate Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robertson Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robertson Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Robertson Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.