Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Anne Ray Foundation

Provide meaningful support to some or all designated supported organizations to make a measurable and sustainable difference on our shared priority problems.

$131M
Granted FY2024still arriving
108
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$8.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Environment$183MArts & Culture$175MPublic Safety & Disaster$126MEducation$93MHuman Services$92MRecreation & Sports$40MAnimals$15MHousing & Shelter$10MOther$0
02FY2024 · 108 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+100 grants · $166M
$1,067,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEREA COLLEGE$8,500,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$6,000,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$5,675,000
PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE (PBS)$5,000,000
YMCA OF THE USA$5,000,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT$4,000,000
YMCA OF THE USA$4,000,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT$4,000,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$3,960,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT$3,833,000
PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE (PBS)$3,500,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$3,300,000
BEREA COLLEGE$3,150,000
PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE (PBS)$3,100,000
PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$3,100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $235.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $6.3M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $4.1M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $5.5M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $4.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $5.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $4.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $4.1M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $4.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $4.1M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $4.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $4.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $3.8M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $4.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3.6M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $3.9M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $3.5M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $3.9M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3.2M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $3.5M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $3.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $3.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $2.7M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $3.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2.6M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $2.6M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $2.3M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $2.5M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2.2M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $2.5M → 14%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL HOME: $7.5M → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $2.1M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $2.5M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $2.1M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $2.3M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2.1M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $2.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $2.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $2.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $2.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $2.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $2.0M → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $2.0M → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $1.7M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 19% of Anne Ray Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Anne Ray Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$587M · 15 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
0

Total granted

$587M
$0

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2020–2024 · $127M · revenue +38%
  • PB
    PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $120M · revenue +27%
  • National Council of YMCAs of the USA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $95M · revenue +68%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

    See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

    Arts & Culture
    2
    American National Standards Institute

    To enhance both the global competitiveness of u.s. business and the u.s. quality of life by promoting and facilitating voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment systems, and safeguarding their integrity.

    Public Benefit
    3
    American Museum of Natural History

    The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

    Arts & Culture
    4
    Science Museum of Minnesota

    The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

    Arts & Culture
    5
    Earth & Space Research

    Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

    Science & Tech
    6
    University of Southern California

    The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

    Education
    7
    California Academy of Sciences

    The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…

    Arts & Culture
    8
    The Asia Society

    The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.

    International
    9
    National Geographic Society

    To increase and diffuse geographic knowledge in the broadest sense, using the power of science, exploration, education and storytelling to illuminate and protect the wonder of the world.

    Education
    10
    United States Naval Institute

    Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

    11
    Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

    The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

    Science & Tech
    12
    San Diego Museum of Art

    To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

    Arts & Culture

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Public Media Group of Southern California and the most unlike its peers is San Diego Humane Society and Spca. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    05the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    10/13
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $127,488,282 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its C…National Council of YMCAs of the USA — $94,821,689 · Human ServicesNational Council of YMCAs of the US…ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL HOME INC — $13,208,500 · Human ServicesST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL HOME INCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $169,620,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP — $23,452,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORPTHE SALVATION ARMY — $18,925,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY — $10,531,000 · OtherPUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE — $120,200,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVI…PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $19,188,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOU…SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $13,675,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONMingei International Inc — $10,565,000 · Arts & CultureMingei International IncTHE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE — $9,827,231 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN SWEDISH INST…BEREA COLLEGE — $89,693,186 · EducationBEREA COLLEGEIDYLLWILD ARTS FOUNDATION — $16,038,000 · EducationIDYLLWILD ARTS …SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $15,116,500 · AnimalsSCHOOL FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH — $4,512,000 · Social Science
    Human Services$235,518,471Other$222,528,000Arts & Culture$173,455,231Education$105,731,186Animals$15,116,500Social Science$4,512,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $169,620,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $127,488,282 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE — $120,200,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetNational Council of YMCAs of the USA — $94,821,689 over 5y, 14% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE — $89,693,186 over 5y, 14% of budgetPUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $19,188,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetIDYLLWILD ARTS FOUNDATION — $16,038,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $15,116,500 over 5y, 12% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $13,675,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL HOME INC — $13,208,500 over 5y, 24% of budgetMingei International Inc — $10,565,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE — $9,827,231 over 5y, 32% of budgetSCHOOL FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH — $4,512,000 over 5y, 23% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
    • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE
    • Who funds National Council of YMCAs of the USA
    • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE
    • Who funds PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    • Who funds IDYLLWILD ARTS FOUNDATION
    • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
    • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    • Who funds ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL HOME INC
    • Who funds Mingei International Inc
    • Who funds THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE
    • Who funds SCHOOL FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Anne Ray Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Anne Ray Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Anne Ray Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph