Skip to content

Vermont · Nonprofit

THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE

THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE (Vermont) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $206,272 to it, the largest being RSF SOCIAL FINANCE INC ($98,250). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 82% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$564k
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$206k
Net assets
$866k
6/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 12%
01What it does

What The International Society for Ecology and Culture does

Mission

ISEC's mission is to protect and renew ecological and social well-being by strengthening local economies and communities worldwide. Our focus is on education -- informing people of the common root causes of the many ecological, social and economic crises we face, and promoting systemic solutions.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Global to Local Education programs. We continued our educational outreach through book and video sales, freely distributed films, podcasts, blogs, and other web-based materials. Among the highlights were a day-long in-person event titled Feminine Futures that featured indigenous scientist Rutendo Ngara; neuroscientist Eva Henje; climate analyst Camila Moreno; environmental activist Thais Mantovani; evolutionary scientist Darcia Narvaez; and food system analyst Anja Lyngbaek. We published nineteen blogs during the year, including those by staff members Alex Jensen, Steven Gorelick, Henry Coleman, and Helena Norberg-Hodge. Helena and others also participated in interviews for written publications, including the New York Times, as well as podcast and YouTube episodes and online events.

    $186,329 spentof which $24,479 as grants
    40% of program spending
  2. Counterdevelopment programs, including Ladakh Project. During summer 2024, Local Futures Ladakh coordinators Kunzang Deachen and Alex Jensen led a collaborative effort with volunteers and numerous groups across the region - including village organizations, outdoor recreation clubs, sustainable travel collectives, and the Women's Alliance of Ladakh. With help from local young people, we completed the restoration of a traditional house in Chuchot village, which now serves as a venue for events like the Western Himalayan Vikalp Sangam. During the year we also revamped our Mindful Travel in Ladakh campaign, helped with the harvest in villages across the region, hosted the Vietnam Community of Integral Learning travel group, and helped the Women's Alliance of Ladakh to organize a variety of workshops. We also screened our films Ancient Futures, The Economics of Happiness and Planet Local every week at Solja Cafe and at Women's Alliance of Ladakh meetings.

    $26,091 spentof which $1,859 as grants
    6% of program spending
  3. Word Localization Day. WLD 2024 events were held in 25 countries, including New Zealand, Switzerland, Cameroon, Bangladesh, Portugal, Spain, Australia, the UK, the US and Japan. A total of 89 events were registered through our online form. However, some of these were campaigns that led to broader actions. For example, the World Farmers Markets Coalition registered their #EatLocalChallenge involving over 70 member associations in 50 countries, representing 20,000 farmers markets, 200,000 families and over 300 million consumers. For WLD 2024 we developed and offered many free resources, including: toolkits for organizing film screenings and local food feasts; free localization films for community screenings; webinars from world localization leaders; our updated Localization Action Guide; and a series of visual posts that have been shared widely through social media. We also created a new WLD website in-house, which now enables us to update and add new material on an ongoing basis. Our own contributions to WLD activities were three events to mark the launch of our new film Closer to Home.

    $36,723 spentof which $1,859 as grants
    8% of program spending
  4. International Alliance for Localization (IAL). We continued to build this international network of grassroots groups working to protect their communities and local environments in the face of rapid development and corporate control. IAL membership continues to grow thanks to World Localization Day, and currently sits at nearly 2,000 members. Our team continues to send out regular news and events updates relevant to localization.

    $5,092 spent
    1% of program spending
  5. Grassroots localization efforts. This effort centers around Byron Bay, Australia, where we work with farmers and food activists to strengthen the region's local food movement. Director Helena Norberg-Hodge also participated in events organized by the indigenous leader Ella Noah Bancroft. We continue to be active in setting up additional farmer's markets in the region, and arguing against zoning regulations obstruct ecological living arrangements like co-housing and ecovillages.

    $7,522 spent
    2% of program spending
  6. Film projects. In 2024 we released three short films: Closer to Home, The Power of Local, and the animated Trade Gone Mad. We also created MP4 files for earlier short video, The Future of Progress, and the feature film, Paradise with Side Effects, and added these to our YouTube channel. Preparations for a major, full-length film began during 2024, with a planned release date of February 2026. The film will include footage of Helena Norberg-Hodge preparing to return to Ladakh fifty years after her first visit, enabling the storyline to cover important lessons from ancient nature-based cultures, as well as the effects of the globalizing economy and the real benefits of systemic localization.

    $204,033 spent
    44% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $465,790.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($552k) Expenses 100 ($470k) Net assets 100 ($723k)2021 Revenue 97 ($534k) Expenses 98 ($461k) Net assets 110 ($796k)2022 Revenue 87 ($483k) Expenses 90 ($423k) Net assets 116 ($835k)2023 Revenue 103 ($567k) Expenses 119 ($557k) Net assets 117 ($845k)2024 Revenue 102 ($564k) Expenses 116 ($544k) Net assets 120 ($866k)
20202021202220232024
Revenue (102)Expenses (116)Net assets (120)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.2M to $1.4M (+11%).

$921k
$1.0M
$1.1M
$1.2M
$1.4M
20202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

95% of THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (73% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,456 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$83k
’20
$73k
’21
$60k
’22
$10k
’23
$20k
’24
29
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Helena Norberg-Hodge

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

20202021202220232024
Listed55554
Joined·+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·0001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 5 funders, grant income fell $31k → $27k.

6 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 82% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

82% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE.

48%
largest funder
75%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 58% · 2020 75% · 2021 60% · 2022 56% · 2023 38% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

82% of THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $38k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Vermont, across 2 states.

NY
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Vermont out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $168k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,356 unclassified nonprofits its size.

Operating margin4% · below the median
Months of reserve29.2mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,356 unclassified nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Vermont

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 9%Fundraising 5%

Governance

4
board members
75%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

29%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE?
THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE (Vermont) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $206,272 to it, the largest being RSF SOCIAL FINANCE INC ($98,250). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 82% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $206,272 in grants to THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE?
RSF SOCIAL FINANCE INC is the largest funder on record, with $98,250 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGY AND CULTURE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Vermont. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing