Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Crawley Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$954k
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Education$865kHuman Services$494kArts & Culture$490kFood & Nutrition$352kEnvironment$243kInternational$235kReligion$148kHousing & Shelter$131kOther$0
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $735k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$75,000
FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC$50,000
COMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC$40,000
OPERA COLORADO$40,000
THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS$35,000
NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC$30,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC$30,000
OPERA COLORADO$25,000
DALLAS CHILDREN'S THEATER$25,000
HITCHCOCK CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT$25,000
FOOD AND SHELTER INC$25,000
MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC$25,000
MOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $285k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $15k → 17%GOODLAND INC: $10k → 24%WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $15k → 17%WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $15k → 17%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $10k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $5k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1k → 13%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $30k → 14%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 14%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 14%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES: $8k → 14%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER: $500 → 12%HOPE SUPPLY CO (FORMERLY CAPTAIN HOPE'S KIDS): $10k → 14%SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER: $500 → 12%HOPE SUPPLY COMPANY: $10k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY COMPANY: $10k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO (FORMERLY CAPTAIN HOPE'S KIDS): $5k → 14%DEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
CO
KY
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Crawley Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 40% of the giving stays in OK; read by stated purpose it is 32% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Crawley Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 52 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
25

Total granted

$2.9M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+21%

Still filing today

85%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $235k · revenue +62%
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $228k · revenue +21%
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $225k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • OC
    OU COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • DM
    DEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -8%
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
2
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
3
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
4
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
5
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
6
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
7
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
8
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
9
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Denver Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Goodland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Women & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsLocal History MuseumsIndependent K-12 SchoolsPublic Library OperationsFaith-Based Social ServicesCancer Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Food Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Elementary Literacy Tutoring
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%51%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%63%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/74
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,491

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/71
Grantees still filing
54/71
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC — $227,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INCTHE URBAN MISSION INC — $185,000 · OtherTHE URBAN MISSION INCAUSTIN PRESBYTERIAN THEOLOGIAL SEMINARY — $142,000 · OtherAUSTIN PRESBYTERIAN THEOLOGIAL SEMINARYTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $142,000 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCHITCHCOCK CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC — $70,000 · OtherFOOD AND SHELTER INC — $85,000 · OtherFOOD AND SHELTER INC+43 more — $511,500 · Other+43 moreUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $237,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKL…Texas A&M Foundation — $225,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foundat…+6 more — $45,000 · Education+6 moreOPERA COLORADO — $148,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA COLORADODALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC — $60,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS CHILDREN…MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER — $40,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTE…OKLAHOMA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY INC — $33,500 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA PHILHA…OKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC — $33,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA ARTS I…ALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureNEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC — $15,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $32,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreNORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC — $82,500 · Human ServicesNORTH DALLAS…INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISI…WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S FUND…VICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER — $40,000 · Human ServicesVICKERY MEAD…HOPE SUPPLY CO — $35,000 · Human ServicesHOPE SUPPLY …THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S …CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $16,000 · Human ServicesDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Human ServicesPOETIC — $15,000 · Human Services+2 more — $11,000 · Human ServicesTHE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE — $235,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $15,000 · InternationalREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $137,550 · Food & NutritionCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $15,000 · Food & Nutrition+5 more — $17,500 · Food & NutritionMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $75,000 · EnvironmentMOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST — $60,000 · Environment
Other$1,363,000Education$507,000Arts & Culture$446,500Human Services$364,500International$250,000Food & Nutrition$170,050Environment$135,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $237,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE — $235,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC — $227,500 over 5y, 21% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE URBAN MISSION INC — $185,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetOPERA COLORADO — $148,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $142,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $137,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD AND SHELTER INC — $85,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetNORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC — $82,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC — $80,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHITCHCOCK CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC — $70,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetMOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST — $60,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetDALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $45,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVICKERY MEADOW LEARNING CENTER — $40,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMETRO CARING — $38,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO — $35,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT — $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetROSE ROCK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $35,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY INC — $33,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC — $33,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS TREES FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNexus Recovery Center Incorporated — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ENGLAND PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARK PEOPLE — $15,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOETIC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYLIBRARY — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSTERLING AND FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOODLAND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord…American Fidelity Fou…The Dallas FoundationTexas Instruments Fou…The Anne and Henry Za…Records Johnston Fami…Communities Foundatio…Rose Community Founda…Cresap Family Foundat…The Addy FoundationSarkeys FoundationHillcrest Foundation
El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Records Johnston Family Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Rose Community Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · The Addy Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Crawley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Hitchcock Center for the Environment Inc — 55% of income from government
  • Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture Inc — 35% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
  • Food and Shelter Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Dean Mcgee Eye Institute — 1% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Arts Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
  • New England Public Media Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home