Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Linked Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$431k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$2.2MInternational$1.8MEducation$705kArts & Culture$358kCommunity Improvement$343kEnvironment$252kPublic Benefit$231kPhilanthropy$204kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $76k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $331k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$100,000
Individual grant recipient$70,000
MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL$61,189
THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$50,000
SANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS$50,000
CARPINTERIA CHILDREN'S PROJECT$20,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$20,000
FOODBANK OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY$15,000
FOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY$10,000
PRO MUJER INC$10,000
FONKOZE USA$5,000
SANTA BARBARA COTTAGE HOSPITAL FOUN$5,000
GIRLS INC OF CARPINTERIA$5,000
FRACTURED ATLAS INC$3,000
LEADING FROM WITHIN$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%POWER TO DECIDE: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Linked Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Linked Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 21 repeat orgs$551k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
17

Total granted

$5.5M
$498k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
0%

Still filing today

57%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS
    6× · 2017–2023 · $846k · revenue +116%
  • SB
    SANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $730k · revenue +177%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $424k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • VR
    VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +47%
  • PT
    POWER TO DECIDEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +68%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $65k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
2
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
3
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
4
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
International Budget Partnership

Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…

International
7
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
8
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

12
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voter Registration Project and the most unlike its peers is Power to Decide. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Accountability R…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Asian American Advocacy & H…Community Arts OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersFallen First Responder Supp…Education Equity LeadershipFood Pantries & AssistanceUnited Way FederationsEarly Childhood Education C…Pregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%55%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr13%8%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,946

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
17/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SANTA BARBARA COTTAGE HOSPITAL FOUN — $764,500 · OtherSANTA BARBARA COTTAGE HOSPITAL FOUNIndividual grant recipient — $574,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INVESTORS ALLIA — $525,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INVESTORS ALLIATHE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC — $315,000 · OtherTHE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $192,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT — $150,000 · OtherFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc — $165,000 · Other+20 more — $685,436 · Other+20 moreGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS — $845,549 · HealthGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPSSANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS — $730,000 · HealthSANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD …THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE — $423,920 · InternationalTHE FRIEND…FONKOZE USA INC — $106,000 · InternationalFONKOZE US…DIRECT RELIEF — $58,569 · InternationalDIRECT REL…+3 more — $29,500 · InternationalMCE SOCIAL CAPITAL — $277,802 · Community ImprovementCARPINTERIA CHILDREN'S PROJECT — $263,310 · Education+1 more — $2,500 · EducationVENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropySANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $51,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC — $50,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $150,000 · EnvironmentLeading from Within — $42,500 · Environment
Other$3,371,636Health$1,575,549International$617,989Community Improvement$277,802Education$265,810Philanthropy$203,500Environment$192,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS — $845,549 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS — $730,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE — $423,920 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetTHE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC — $315,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMCE SOCIAL CAPITAL — $277,802 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCARPINTERIA CHILDREN'S PROJECT — $263,310 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc — $165,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $150,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT — $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFONKOZE USA INC — $106,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPOWER TO DECIDE — $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetVENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF CARPINTERIA — $79,100 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $58,569 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION — $51,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAsian & Pacific Islander American Vote — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLeading from Within — $42,500 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetPRO MUJER INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES — $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FIREFIGHTERS ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNOVATIONS IN HEALTHCARE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITE TO LIGHT INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCIVIC INFLUENCERS INC — $1,036 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE
  • Who funds THE RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL
  • Who funds CARPINTERIA CHILDREN'S PROJECT
  • Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
  • Who funds VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT
  • Who funds FONKOZE USA INC
  • Who funds POWER TO DECIDE
  • Who funds VENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF CARPINTERIA
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Asian & Pacific Islander American Vote
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Leading from Within
  • Who funds PRO MUJER INC
  • Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC VENTURES
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA FIREFIGHTERS ALLIANCE
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
  • Who funds DOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC
  • Who funds INNOVATIONS IN HEALTHCARE INC
  • Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · James S Bower Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Towbes Foundation · G a Fowler Family Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · California Community Foundation · Giles 2000 Tr Dba Giles Family Foundation · The Turpin-Allebrand Family Charitable Foundation · The B & B Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Linked Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Documentary Educational Resources Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Linked Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Linked Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph