Loading…
Loading…
Ohio · Nonprofit
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF (Ohio) is funded by 55 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $4,651,681 in grants to it, the largest being THE COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ($847,886). 39 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF's revenue fell 29% between 2018 and 2023.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,811 education nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
8% of THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (26% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$31k from 2 funders in 2025, up from $128k and 8 in 2017.
26 of 55 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 75% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 55 funders by total. Association, not causation.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 18% of grant income, and it takes 6 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 6 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 39% · 2018 29% · 2019 27% · 2020 18% · 2021 15% · 2022 24% · 2023 35% · 2024 51% · 2025 59% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
45% of THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 71% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF draws 54% of its grant income from funders outside Ohio — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 23 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 55 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
88% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 12 states
Part of a family of 3 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 55funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing