· Private foundation
Red Acre Farm Inc Dba Red Acre Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k34 grants · $252k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $136k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEDICINE HORSE CENTER | $12,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP WORKS | $11,000 |
| MASS AUDUBON SOCIETY DRUMLIN FARM | $11,000 |
| DAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY | $11,000 |
| SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SHELTER | $11,000 |
| ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF ME | $10,000 |
| BUTTONWOOD PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER | $10,000 |
| EQUINE VOICES RESCUE SANCTUARY | $10,000 |
| ROCKIN T EQUINE RESCUE | $10,000 |
| DOGSTERS | $10,000 |
| MAINE STATE SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF ANIMALS | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR WILDLIFE | $10,000 |
| PAT BRODY SHELTER FOR CATS | $9,500 |
| LOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BPBUTTONWOOD PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +46%
- TMThe Medicine Horse Center9× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +26%
- SCSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +164%
Funded once
- SCSTOW CONSERVATION TRUST INCone grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue -1%
- UVUPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETYone grant, 2017 · $8k
- PIPoundhounds Incone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -78% · 49% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Animal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard is to provide shelter, health care, lover and support to all domestic animals until a permanent home is found for them.
The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
Animal Welfare
To prevent cruelty and encourage and educate humane treatment of animals.
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
Animal rescue
Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society for Greater Nashua Corp and the most unlike its peers is Spring Creek Horse Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Rockin T Equine Rescue ↗
- Who funds BUTTONWOOD PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds The Medicine Horse Center ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WILD CAREINC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR WILDLIFE ↗
- Who funds DAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Equine Voices Rescue & Sanctuary ↗
- Who funds LOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC ↗
- Who funds RIDING TO THE TOP ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIPWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds MAINE STATE SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds Parker's Animal Rescue ↗
- Who funds PAT BRODY SHELTER FOR CATS INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER NASHUA CORP ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds MERRIMACK RIVER FELINE RESCUE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER ANDROSCOGGIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR CATS A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Spring Creek Horse Rescue ↗
- Who funds MERWIN MEMORIAL FREE CLINIC FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BOSTON ↗
- Who funds VERMONT INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC DBA HOMEWARD BOUND ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds Marine Mammals of Maine ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc · Shirley Shattuck Windsor Charitable Trust · The Horne Family Foundation · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · Massachusetts Animal Coalition Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Ahimsa Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Red Acre Farm Inc Dba Red Acre Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Marine Life Center Inc — 16% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- The Nature Connection Inc — 5% of income from government
- New England Wildlife Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Animal Rescue League of Boston — 0% of income from government
- Vermont Institute of Natural Science Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Red Acre Farm Inc Dba Red Acre Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Red Acre Farm Inc Dba Red Acre Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.