Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION

SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,754,567 to it, the largest being CARESTAR FOUNDATION ($500,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$2.8M
Funders on record
16
Grants received
$1.8M
Net assets
$6.9M
10/16 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 25%
01What it does

What Sutter Roseville Medical Center Foundation does

Mission

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality, equitable care and take on the toughest challenges. CURIOSITY - We are constantly learning and creating new ways to advance healthcare. TEAMWORK - We collaborate with humility and solve for ONE Sutter. COMPASSION - We show empathy and understanding in every personal interaction. INCLUSION - We respect our differences and similarities, and cultivate a sense of belonging. INTEGRITY - We earn trust by doing the right thing and delivering on our commitments.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Program Service Accomplishments: Through philanthropy, Sutter Health is able to practice the most innovative, technologically-advanced medicine possible and meet the critical health care demands of our time. In 2024, Sutter Roseville Medical Center Foundation provided over $1 million in philanthropic gifts to support programs, services, and equipment to ensure the highest level of excellence in patient care. The list below highlights our allocation of gifts. Total funds were allocated for the following programs, services, and equipment: . Cancer Patient Wigs and Head Coverings . Cancer Survivorship Resource Center . Cardiac Rehab Patient Equipment . Chaplaincy Services . ENT Surgical Navigation Software and Instrumentation . Expansion of Emergency and Critical Care Services . iCAD AI Development Pilot - Breast Imaging . Institute for Health and Healing Program . Infant Loss Program . Laryngeal Videostroboscopy Equipment . NICU . Neurological Music Therapy . Patient Assistance . Patient Education Materials . Pet Therapy . Rehabilitation Services VR Therapy System . Staff Education & Training . Stroke Center Surgical Instruments . Therapeutic Music Program Donor support helped heal…

    $1,414,670 spentof which $1,000,132 as grants$1,109,418 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,414,670.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.5M) Expenses 100 ($2.1M) Net assets 100 ($6.1M)2018 Revenue 177 ($2.7M) Expenses 126 ($2.6M) Net assets 94 ($5.8M)2019 Revenue 176 ($2.7M) Expenses 88 ($1.8M) Net assets 112 ($6.8M)2020 Revenue 192 ($2.9M) Expenses 166 ($3.5M) Net assets 105 ($6.4M)2021 Revenue 152 ($2.3M) Expenses 141 ($3.0M) Net assets 96 ($5.9M)2022 Revenue 131 ($2.0M) Expenses 78 ($1.6M) Net assets 95 ($5.8M)2023 Revenue 128 ($2.0M) Expenses 93 ($1.9M) Net assets 100 ($6.1M)2024 Revenue 184 ($2.8M) Expenses 101 ($2.1M) Net assets 112 ($6.9M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (184)Expenses (101)Net assets (112)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $8.0M to $5.8M (−28%).

$8.0M
$5.8M
$7.2M
$7.7M
$6.5M
$6.1M
$6.4M
$7.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

46% of SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,611 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$575k
’17
$57k
’18
$836k
’19
−$558k
’20
−$634k
’21
$364k
’22
$6k
’23
$670k
’24
7.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Tammy Powers

CEO, srmc

Board chair

Joseph Whitters

Trustee/Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2216131415141615
Joined·+2+1+1+4+0+4+2
No longer listed·8403123
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose $22k → $322k.

7 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 43% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $70k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Sacramento Region Community Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION raised.

From the IRS filings of SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 28% of grant income and the top three 68%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

87% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION.

28%
largest funder
68%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 63% · 2018 100% · 2019 74% · 2020 69% · 2021 57% · 2022 83% · 2023 57% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

44% of SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

90% of SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION's grant income comes from California funders.

WI
CA
CO
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $752k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 8,121 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin24% · top quartile
Months of reserve7.2mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,121 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

67% of spending goes to programs.

Program 67%Management 33%Fundraising 0%

Governance

13
board members
77%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

64%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 53 related entities

  • California Pacific Medical Ctr Found · exempt
  • Sutter Community Health · exempt
  • Memorial Hospital Foundation · exempt
  • Mills-Peninsula Hospital Foundation · exempt
  • Sutter Bay Medical Foundation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION?
SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,754,567 to it, the largest being CARESTAR FOUNDATION ($500,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 16 organizations giving $1,754,567 in grants to SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION?
CARESTAR FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $500,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 16 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing