· Private foundation
Carestar Foundation
TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES FOR ALL CALIFORNIANS, WE USE A RACIAL EQUITY LENS TO FUND AND ADVOCATE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO OUR EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEM.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
- $50k–250k27 grants · $3.0M
- $250k+6 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCATES | $750,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $333,333 |
| Individual grant recipient | $333,333 |
| NUESTRA COMUNIDAD | $250,000 |
| NATIONAL INDIAN JUSTICE CENTER | $250,000 |
| LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY | $250,000 |
| SUTTER COAST HOSPITAL | $233,333 |
| CA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AUTHORITY | $200,000 |
| CITY OF EUREKA | $200,000 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UCSF | $158,333 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UCSF | $158,333 |
| SAN RAMON VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION | $150,000 |
| HEALTH RESOURCE IN ACTION (HRIA) | $150,000 |
| HEALTH RESOURCE IN ACTION (HRIA) | $150,000 |
| KINGS VIEW | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of Carestar Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCATES5× · 2020–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +36%
- CICALIFORNIA INDIAN MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER2× · 2022–2023 · $500k · revenue +29%
- SCSUTTER COAST HOSPITAL2× · 2023–2024 · $492k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- SRSUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue +4%
- ROREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAone grant, 2019 · $463k
Public Health Institutegraduated2× · 2020–2022 · $420k · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Supporting kaiser permanente organizations which provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.
The Organization advocates for health equity by leading and facilitating convenings in all regions of California for the purpose of providing policy analysis, research and training that promotes best practices, which supports the creation…
Physicians for a Healthy California is dedicated to improving community health, growing a diverse physician workforce and promoting health equity. Our programs continue to improve public health, provide clinical practice support and…
The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in…
Health Care for All is the heart of the Oakland-based grassroots organization Street Level Health Project Street Level. Incorporated in 2001, Street Level is a critical entry point into the healthcare and social service system for those…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is Youth Recovery Connections. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NUESTRA COMUNIDAD ↗
- Who funds Interface Children Family Services ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INDIAN MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUTTER COAST HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds California Pan-Ethnic Health Network ↗
- Who funds University of the Pacific ↗
- Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
- Who funds HEALTH ACCESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH RECOVERY CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds KINGS VIEW ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ALIVE ↗
- Who funds Prevention Institute ↗
- Who funds JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL INDIAN JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Public Works Alliance ↗
- Who funds SOLEDAD ENRICHMENT ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WELLSPACE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA YOUTH EMT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT FOR ACTIVELY RISING YOUTH ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds Anti Police-Terror Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Tabi MOMS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The California Endowment · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · East Bay Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Public Health Institute · California Healthcare Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carestar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Carestar Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Carestar Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.