Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

North Carolina · Nonprofit

Studio 1

Studio 1 (North Carolina) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $145,098 to it, the largest being THE TROON FOUNDATION ($40,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$469k
Revenue FY2025
8
Funders on record
$145k
Grants received
$49k
Net assets
4/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 21%

Against its field

Studio 1 has grown faster than half of the 10,664 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Months of reserve0.6mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)17% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,664 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($129k) Expenses 100 ($124k) Net assets 100 ($14k)2018 Revenue 102 ($132k) Expenses 103 ($128k) Net assets 131 ($18k)2019 Revenue 137 ($178k) Expenses 116 ($144k) Net assets 375 ($51k)2020 Revenue 100 ($129k) Expenses 114 ($141k) Net assets 321 ($44k)2021 Revenue 106 ($137k) Expenses 125 ($155k) Net assets 411 ($56k)2022 Revenue 236 ($304k) Expenses 221 ($275k) Net assets 630 ($86k)2023 Revenue 251 ($325k) Expenses 278 ($345k) Net assets 481 ($66k)2024 Revenue 275 ($356k) Expenses 296 ($367k) Net assets 397 ($54k)2025 Revenue 363 ($469k) Expenses 383 ($475k) Net assets 357 ($49k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (363)Expenses (383)Net assets (357)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

43% of Studio 1’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,459 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$5k
17
$4k
18
$33k
19
$12k
20
$18k
21
$30k
22
$20k
23
$11k
24
$5k
25
0.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $6k → $29k.

2 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)9% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Studio 1’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Studio 1 leans on a few funders — its largest provides 28% of grant income and the top three 68%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

49% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Studio 1.

28%
largest funder
68%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 99% · 2021 99% · 2022 97% · 2023 75%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

92% of Studio 1's grant income comes from North Carolina funders.

NY
NC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
22
23
North Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $14k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 229 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding Studio 1 receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $15k on record.

Federal$15k
grants $15kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$15k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Studio 1

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In North Carolina

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 17%Fundraising 0%

Governance

18
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

92%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Studio 1: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Studio 1?
Studio 1 (North Carolina) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $145,098 to it, the largest being THE TROON FOUNDATION ($40,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Studio 1 have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $145,098 in grants to Studio 1, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Studio 1?
THE TROON FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $40,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Studio 1 find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing