Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

Spaulding for Children

Spaulding for Children (Michigan) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,735,786 to it, the largest being DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION ($1,387,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$15M
Funders on record
11
Grants received
$2.7M
Net assets
$8.8M
3/11 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 3%
01What it does

What Spaulding for Children does

Mission

In partnership with diverse communities, Spaulding for Children's mission is to develop and integrate revolutionary and innovative programs that provide families the support needed to enhance the care of children and youth with the pursuit of permanency.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Child and Family Services (CFS)During the last year, Spaulding for Children was able to return 12 children home. This was an increase of one child from the previous year. An additional two children were able to secure permanency through a guardianship with a relative. Lastly, 10 children achieved permanency through adoption. The agency was able to work with over 110 families.

    $3,911,071 spent$3,977,367 earned by the program
    30% of program spending
  2. Spaulding Institute and AcademyThe Academy and the Institute had a total of 4 federal grants over the past year. One project focuses on increasing kinship support and shared parenting in Macomb County. Another project has several sites working on youth engagement practices. There is an extension of a project to support implementation and training of new foster and adopt parents across the nation. We have a project focused on supporting sites to improve their post-permanency services. Two projects are both subawards, one focused on leadership development for adoption professionals and another on training hospital staff on adoption sensitivity.

    $8,960,126 spent
    70% of program spending
  3. Scholarships for Children formerly served by the OrganizationSpaulding for Children provides scholarship funds to support youth interested in higher education or to assist with trade related programs. This year we sent applications to eligible people but did not receive any completed applications. No awards were provided.

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $12,871,197.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($9.4M) Expenses 100 ($8.9M) Net assets 100 ($4.9M)2018 Revenue 113 ($11M) Expenses 114 ($10M) Net assets 110 ($5.4M)2019 Revenue 118 ($11M) Expenses 122 ($11M) Net assets 112 ($5.5M)2020 Revenue 77 ($7.3M) Expenses 84 ($7.5M) Net assets 121 ($6.0M)2021 Revenue 79 ($7.5M) Expenses 82 ($7.3M) Net assets 137 ($6.7M)2022 Revenue 108 ($10M) Expenses 107 ($9.5M) Net assets 125 ($6.2M)2023 Revenue 119 ($11M) Expenses 124 ($11M) Net assets 143 ($7.1M)2024 Revenue 155 ($15M) Expenses 157 ($14M) Net assets 178 ($8.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (155)Expenses (157)Net assets (178)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $8.6M to $12M (+35%).

$6.4M
$6.9M
$8.0M
$7.4M
$7.7M
$7.6M
$8.6M
$12M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 64% · 2018 73% · 2019 76% · 2020 57% · 2021 52% · 2022 57% · 2023 61% · 2024 66%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

70% of Spaulding for Children’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,400 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$527k
’17
$469k
’18
$247k
’19
−$221k
’20
$175k
’21
$682k
’22
$219k
’23
$664k
’24
2.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Melissa Jenovai

President/CEO

Board chair

Kristi Plain

Board President

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2120252121212323
Joined·+4+9+3+4+9+7+9
No longer listed·5474959
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $180k → $243k.

3 of 11 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 16% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Spaulding for Children’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Spaulding for Children leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Spaulding for Children.

51%
largest funder
97%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 97% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 62% · 2021 65% · 2022 63% · 2023 64% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

60% of Spaulding for Children's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 27% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Spaulding for Children draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside Michigan, across 5 states in all.

MI
NY
OH
VA
MD

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $430k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Spaulding for Children runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 3,288 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin5% · above the median
Months of reserve2.0mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,288 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Government funding Spaulding for Children receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $64.8M on record — $64.8M federal, $808 state.

Federal$64.8M
grants $64.8Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$64.8M
State$808
03
05
06
07
20
22
By state
  • NJ$650
  • VT$158

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Spaulding for Children

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 10%Fundraising 1%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Spaulding for Children: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Spaulding for Children?
Spaulding for Children (Michigan) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,735,786 to it, the largest being DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION ($1,387,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Spaulding for Children have?
IRS filings report 11 organizations giving $2,735,786 in grants to Spaulding for Children, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Spaulding for Children?
DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION is the largest funder on record, with $1,387,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Spaulding for Children find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Spaulding for Children →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 11 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing