Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Texas · Nonprofit

SPARK WORLDWIDE

SPARK WORLDWIDE (Texas) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $53,889 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($20,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$3.0M
Revenue FY2024
6
Funders on record
$54k
Grants received
$71k
Net assets
2/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%

Against its field

SPARK WORLDWIDE has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,384 religion nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−0% · below the median
Months of reserve0.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)32% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,384 religion nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($558k) Expenses 100 ($563k) Net assets 100 ($39k)2020 Revenue 139 ($776k) Expenses 128 ($721k) Net assets 212 ($83k)2021 Revenue 298 ($1.7M) Expenses 285 ($1.6M) Net assets 365 ($143k)2022 Revenue 449 ($2.5M) Expenses 432 ($2.4M) Net assets 547 ($215k)2023 Revenue 343 ($1.9M) Expenses 363 ($2.0M) Net assets 204 ($80k)2024 Revenue 536 ($3.0M) Expenses 532 ($3.0M) Net assets 182 ($71k)
201820202021202220232024
Revenue (536)Expenses (532)Net assets (182)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

93% of SPARK WORLDWIDE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (90% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,725 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$5k
18
$55k
20
$60k
21
$72k
22
$126k
23
$9k
24
0.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $500 → $516.

5 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $1.2M from 2 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Troy Brewer Charitable Network). These are real filings, and they are not money SPARK WORLDWIDE raised.

From the IRS filings of SPARK WORLDWIDE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 5 of 6 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SPARK WORLDWIDE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 84%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SPARK WORLDWIDE.

38%
largest funder
84%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 97% · 2022 58% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of SPARK WORLDWIDE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $54k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like SPARK WORLDWIDE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 9%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SPARK WORLDWIDE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SPARK WORLDWIDE?
SPARK WORLDWIDE (Texas) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $53,889 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($20,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SPARK WORLDWIDE have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $53,889 in grants to SPARK WORLDWIDE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SPARK WORLDWIDE?
NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC is the largest funder on record, with $20,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SPARK WORLDWIDE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing