Rhode Island · Nonprofit
ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC
ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC (Rhode Island) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $322,521 to it, the largest being CHARITABLE TRUST UNDER ARTICLE VII OF THE ($290,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 11,754 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,754 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Joseph and Rosalyn Sinclair Foundation Incshared fundersportfolio match
- F B Hazard-Gen Charity Fdshared funders
- Central Park Conservancy Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
99% of ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $15k → $40k.
1 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
Left out of every figure on this page: $2.7M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest The Rhode Island Community Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC raised.
From the IRS filings of ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 90% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 81% · 2021 89% · 2022 75% · 2023 62% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC's grant income comes from Rhode Island funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $21 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 317 organizations that share them.
- The Joseph and Rosalyn Sinclair Foundation Incshared fundersportfolio matchRI · backs 21 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- F B Hazard-Gen Charity Fdshared fundersTX · backs 15 organizations that share your funders
- Central Park Conservancy Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Philmoney Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lawrence & Lillian Solomon Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Van Beuren Charitable Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Weisberg Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Loebs Family Foundation 7521-Xxxxxx16336portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- New York Road Runners Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ress Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cvs Health Charity Classic Incshared funderslocalRI · backs 40 organizations that share your funders · funds 58 organizations near you
- Ejmp Fund for Philanthropyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Rhode Island
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
60% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC?
- ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC (Rhode Island) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $322,521 to it, the largest being CHARITABLE TRUST UNDER ARTICLE VII OF THE ($290,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC have?
- IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $322,521 in grants to ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC?
- CHARITABLE TRUST UNDER ARTICLE VII OF THE is the largest funder on record, with $290,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Rhode Island. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing