· Private foundation
Charitable Trust Under Article VII of The
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $210k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Preservation Society of Newport County | $125,000 |
| Elizabeth Park Conservancy | $50,000 |
| Edgewood Waterfront Preservation Assn | $25,000 |
| Audubon Society of Rhode Island | $25,000 |
| Narragansett Historical Society | $25,000 |
| Pawtuxet Village Association | $25,000 |
| Jamestown Historical Society | $25,000 |
| Roger Williams Park Conservancy | $25,000 |
| Rose Island Lighthouse Foundation | $20,000 |
| Blithewold | $10,000 |
| South County Health | $10,000 |
| Conanicut Island Land Trust | $10,000 |
| Beavertail Lighthouse Museum Assoc | $10,000 |
| What Cheer Flower Farm | $5,000 |
| Taylor Point Restoration Assoc | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $290k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY6× · 2017–2024 · $435k · revenue +86%
- EPELIZABETH PARK CONSERVANCY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $410k · revenue +106%
- RIROSE ISLAND LIGHTHOUSE AND FORT HAMILTON TRUST INC8× · 2017–2024 · $145k · revenue +75%
Funded once
- CLConanicut Land Trustone grant, 2017 · $15k
- FOFriends of Salter Groveone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To create, develop and maintain a tourism foundation for the promotion of tourism for the city of jamestown, county of stutsman and the surrounding area
The mission of the Hampton Historical Society is to increase public knowledge and understanding of the history and cultural heritage of the town of Hampton, New Hampshire, from its earliest inhabitants to the present generation. We will…
The purpose of the organization is to provide environmental education, preserve the integrity of hammonasset state park's natural resources, and to act as an advocate of the park.
The Rhode Island Natural History Survey is an independent nonprofit organization founded in 1994 to gather and disseminate information on Rhode Islands animals and plants geology and ecosystems to facilitate communication among the diverse…
Preserve ri's vision is a future where historic preservation creates positive change, making our diverse cultures, the environment, and the economy better for the people who live, visit and work in rhode island. preserve ri's mission is to…
Discover memorialize & preserve the history and architecture of pawtucket ri by charitable & educational means through community service and preservation and maintenance of histroical buildings in the city.
The amagansett historical association is dedicated to preserving the cultural heritage of the hamlet of amagansett - founded in 1680, for the benefit of the local community, scholars and students, and the general public that visits the…
The purpose and mission of the fenton history center is to provide education and cultural opportunities for the residents of chautauqua county and its visitors through the collection, preservation and exhibition of artifacts and archival…
To protect, preserve and interpret the martime heritage of the lower Merrimack Valley region and how it relates to American History
The preservation & maintenance of historic buildings and conservation of environmentally sensitive land surrounding historic buildings.
The purpose of the "Society" is to collect, preserve, and interpret Wethersfield's past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jamestown Historical Society and the most unlike its peers is The Flower District. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROGER WILLIAMS PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds ROSE ISLAND LIGHTHOUSE AND FORT HAMILTON TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds AUDUBON SOCIETY OF RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds BEAVERTAIL LIGHTHOUSE MUSEUM ASSOC ↗
- Who funds NARRAGANSETT HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CONANICUT ISLAND LAND TRUST CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE STATION FIRE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN PHILOMENIAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLITHEWOLD INC ↗
- Who funds THE FLOWER DISTRICT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rhode Island Community Foundation · The Champlin Foundation · Van Beuren Charitable Foundation Inc · Citizens Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Amica Companies Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charitable Trust Under Article VII of The funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Charitable Trust Under Article VII of The?
Find your warmest path to Charitable Trust Under Article VII of The through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.