How much did CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION reported 49 grants totaling $16,029,873 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION based?

CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION is based in UT.

CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION

Operates exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and/or carry out the purposes of crewe foundation, a utah nonprofit organization, which is exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

$16M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$7.0M

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $36k
$10k–50k26 grants · $429k
$50k–250k14 grants · $1.2M
$250k+4 grants · $14M

$20,500

Median grant

States reached

$50M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF$6,961,681
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIV - BYU ATHL$4,600,000
FOR OTHERS$1,900,000
CREWE FOUNDATION$759,300
WASATCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION$150,000
MENTORS INTERNATIONAL$100,000
THE COACHES TEAM FOUNDATION$100,000
RISE AND REBUILD FOUNDATION$100,000
ESPECIALLY FOR ATHLETES INC$100,000
FRIENDS OF CASA DE HOGAR$100,000
AYUDA EN MEXICO INC$100,000
OTHER SIDE VILLAGE$90,000
NPH USA$82,000
SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERISTY FOUN$60,000
PACHAMAMA ALLIANCE$55,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 5% — the area typically sits at 8%. 7% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$23M · 10 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$23M

$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+163%

+193%

Still filing today

70%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FO
FOR OTHERS
2× · 2023–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +393%
CF
CREWE FOUNDATION
3× · 2022–2024 · $999k · revenue +1538% · 84% of their budget
WE
WASATCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $300k · revenue +257%

Funded once

EC
ELEVATE CHARITIESgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +1318%
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +37%
HC
HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +193%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

U of O Foundation Supporting

Assist university of oregon foundation in its activities to support the university of oregon.

Education

Washington State University Foundation

The mission of the Foundation is to promote, accept, and maximize private support for programs, initiatives, and properties of Washington State University and its regional campuses. The Foundation also prudently manages, invests, and…

Education

Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.

Education

Missouri Western State University

Promote private giving and help the university move into the forefront of public higher education.

—

Western Oregon University Development

The western oregon university foundation exists to strengthen relationships and provide resources in order to serve and support the mission and vision of western oregon university

Education

The University Foundation At Sacramento

The university foundation promotes philanthropy to provide a level of excellence at the university beyond what is possible through state funds.

Education

Colorado State University Foundation

Colorado state university foundation receives, manages and invests gifts in support of csu.

Education

The University Corporation San

University corporation serves as an auxiliary organization of san francisco state university.

Education

Community College of Philadelphia

Raising philanthropic funds to support the college, its students, programs and initiatives.

Education

University of Denver

A higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education

The Community Foundation of Louisville

To mobilize people, networks, and capital to spark meaningful change in and beyond louisville.

Philanthropy

Allosource

Allosource responsibly processes and distributes human donated tissue that enhances and saves lives.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Orphans and the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/50

the rest of the field

13%

1,562/12,353

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

40/40

Grantees still filing

32/40

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$19,213,841Human Services$2,743,500Philanthropy$1,019,194Education$502,500International$397,000Youth Development$122,500Crime & Legal$110,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA12.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CREWE FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 16.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 824114033 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CREWE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 84% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Crewe Endowment Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Crewe Endowment Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Crewe Endowment Foundation?

More from the funding graph

CREWE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Crewe Endowment Foundation?

More from the funding graph