· Public charity
Feed My Hungry Children
Global famine, poverty and natural disasters cause severe suffering among large populations of children around the world.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $193,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $893,410 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $700,160 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $161k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANTI ANIMAL CRUELTY CAMPAIGN | $60,000 |
| THE 3000 CLUB | $51,000 |
| FEED MY CHILDREN'S FUND | $50,000 |
| FRESH START CHURCH | $26,250 |
| RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $157k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $3.0M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Program Support
Stated purpose: Program Support
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +137% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- T3THE 3000 CLUB5× · 2017–2024 · $157k · revenue +147%
- FSFRESH START ASSEMBLY OF GOD4× · 2021–2024 · $116k
- AAANTI ANIMAL CRUELTY CAMPAIGN2× · 2022–2024 · $110k · revenue +137% · 52% of their budget
Funded once
- ECENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION CAMPAIGNone grant, 2022 · $35k
- HGHANDS GIVING HOPEone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -18%
- WEWORLD EMERGENCY RELIEFgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +85%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Organization provides feeding programs and humanitarian aid to disadvantaged and needy individuals. The Organization also provides medical aid and supplies to devastated regions in third world countries.
Global famine, poverty and natural disasters cause severe suffering among large populations of children around the world. In association with their international partners and local voluteers the Organization distributes medical equipment,…
To provide World Wide relief and reduce human suffering from hunger, diseases, war, and natural disasters through the distribution of medical equipment, supplies, and food distributions to disadvantaged people.
The Organization supports programs that help needy families in third-world countries by providing food, clothing and medical care.
Philippine Childrens Hunger Fund supports programs that assist children by providing education, books, teachers, classrooms, transportation and food. The Organization also ships containers of medical supplies, medical equipment, and…
The Organization provides information concerning childhood cancer. It provides grants, medical equipment and supplies to hospitals and clinics that treat childhood cancer and other degenerative diseases.
Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.
Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.
The organization provides medical assistance programs for leukemia and cancer patients. It provides medical equipment, supplies and humanitarian aid to hospitals, clinics and other supportive organizations.
The Organization supports similar organizations with the recovery and distribution of foods to suffering children and families. The Organization distributes medical aid to poverty stricken regions worldwide.
The Organization awards grants for Kidney diseases research and assistance programs. It ships humanitarian aid, produce and fruits to impoverished communities to help fight kidney and other degenerative diseases.
Operational, logistical, and financial assistance to the Tarahumara Indians of Chihuahua, Mexico through programs and projects admininisterd through the Jesuits, a religious order of the Roman Catholic Church.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America's Hungry Children and the most unlike its peers is Society of St Vincent de Paul Tucson. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The 3000 Club · Give Back Foundation · Feeding America's Hungry Children · Feeding God's Children · Feeding America's Children · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · Cancer Aid and Research Fund · Good360 · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Feed My Hungry Children funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Feed My Hungry Children?
Find your warmest path to Feed My Hungry Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.