· Public charity
Feeding America's Children
Collection and distribution of food and medical supplies to those in need in Arizona, the United States and other desperate famine stricken third world countries.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $74,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $246,438 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $172,438 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FEED MY CHILDREN FUND | $40,000 |
| THE 3000 CLUB | $29,000 |
| ANTI ANIMAL CRUELTY CAMPAIGN | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FMFEED MY CHILDREN'S FUND5× · 2021–2025 · $241k · revenue +38%
- T3THE 3000 CLUB6× · 2019–2025 · $132k · revenue +167%
- FMFEED MY HUNGRY CHILDREN2× · 2019–2020 · $24k · revenue +0%
Funded once
- FAFEEDING A CHILDS HUNGERone grant, 2022 · $28k
- MSMILITARY SUPPORT FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue ×23
- RCRESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGNone grant, 2022 · $24k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Organization provides for medical aid and supplies to devastated regions in third world countries. The Organization also provides feeding programs and humanitarian aid to disadvantaged children and needy individuals in the Southwestern…
The Organization provides feeding programs and humanitarian aid to disadvantaged and needy individuals. The Organization also provides medical aid and supplies to devastated regions in third world countries.
To provide World Wide relief and reduce human suffering from hunger, diseases, war, and natural disasters through the distribution of medical equipment, supplies, and food distributions to disadvantaged people.
Collection and distribution of food and medical supplies to those in need in Arizona, the United States and other desperate famine stricken third world countries.
Feeding and clothing of underpriviledged and disadvanged children in impoverished areas of third world countries.
Philippine Childrens Hunger Fund supports programs that assist children by providing education, books, teachers, classrooms, transportation and food. The Organization also ships containers of medical supplies, medical equipment, and…
To reduce animal suffering due to hunger, disease and natural disasters and engage in disease prevention, feeding, medical care and food distribution to all suffering animals in need of care.
Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.
Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.
The Organization supports similar organizations with the recovery and distribution of foods to suffering children and families. The Organization distributes medical aid to poverty stricken regions worldwide.
The Organization supports programs that help needy families in third-world countries by providing food, clothing and medical care.
Provides financial assistance and ships medical supplies to hospitals and clinics in third-world countries, stricken by femine and poverty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Children's Fund and the most unlike its peers is Hope of Life International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Feeding America's Hungry Children · The 3000 Club · Give Back Foundation · Feeding God's Children · Feed My Hungry Children · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Feeding America's Children funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Feeding America's Children?
Find your warmest path to Feeding America's Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.