· Private foundation
LT Murray Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $181k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TACOMA ART MUSEUM TACOMA WA | $75,000 |
| MARY BRIDGE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| PORTLAND ART MUSEUM | $30,000 |
| COLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM INC | $25,000 |
| HELEN B MURRAY ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION | $22,500 |
| DEGREES OF CHANGE | $13,000 |
| PEDIATRIC INTERIM CARE CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER OF PIERCE COUNTY | $10,000 |
| NOURISH PIERCE COUNTY | $10,000 |
| STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER | $10,000 |
| ASIA PACIFIC CULTURAL CENTER | $10,000 |
| GRAND TACOMA CINE CLUB | $10,000 |
| COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF TACOMA PIERC | $10,000 |
| GOODWILL OF THE OLYMPICS AND RAINIER REGION | $10,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $149k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
COLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM4× · 2021–2024 · $150k · revenue +5%- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2022 · $125k · revenue +7%
- HBHELEN B MURRAY ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $113k · revenue +271% · 54% of their budget
Funded once
- MFMULTICARE FOUNDATIONSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +59%
- LTL'ARCHE TAHOMA HOPE COMMUNITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +28%
- TCTacoma Community Houseone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.
To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.
Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
To grow a lasting culture of generosity and well-being in the South Puget Sound through connection, leadership, and investment.
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.
RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.
To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.
To restore habitat, water quality and native species in the puget sound
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Tacoma Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cause for Sb Paws. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Tacoma Art Museum ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA RIVER MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HELEN B MURRAY ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TACOMA ARTS LIVE ↗
- Who funds ANNIE WRIGHT SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds GREENTRIKE ↗
- Who funds DEGREES OF CHANGE ↗
- Who funds YWCA PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Pediatric Interim Care Center ↗
- Who funds HAMLIN ROBINSON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SYMPHONY TACOMA ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds Greater Metro Parks Foundation dba Tacoma Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Goodwill of the Olympics and Rainier Region ↗
- Who funds Friends of Lakewood ↗
- Who funds Nourish Pierce County ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TACOMA STUDENTS ↗
- Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds Northwest Outward Bound School ↗
- Who funds L'ARCHE TAHOMA HOPE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Tacoma Community House ↗
- Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC ↗
- Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds La Casa de las Madres ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds NW FURNITURE BANK ↗
- Who funds Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center ↗
- Who funds GRAND TACOMA CINE CLUB DBA THE GRAND CINEMA ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NEW PHOEBE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds FUSION-FRIENDS UNITED TO SHELTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bamford Foundation · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · Forest Foundation · Woodworth Family Foundation · Sequoia Foundation · Heidner Marco J Char Trust · Ben B Cheney Foundation Inc · Korum for Kids Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization LT Murray Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Columbia River Maritime Museum — 3% of income from government
- Justice Dance Performance Project Inc — 2% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to LT Murray Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to LT Murray Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.