Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

California · Nonprofit

REBUILD THE DREAM

REBUILD THE DREAM (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,034,659 to it, the largest being THE JUST TRUST FOR ACTION ($600,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$863k
Revenue FY2025
7
Funders on record
$1.0M
Grants received
$982k
Net assets
2/7 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

REBUILD THE DREAM runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,762 public benefit nonprofits its size.

Operating margin54% · top quartile
Months of reserve17.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)24% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,762 public benefit nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($157k) Expenses 100 ($275k) Net assets 100 ($521k)2018 Revenue 65 ($103k) Expenses 186 ($513k) Net assets 20 ($106k)2019 Revenue 64 ($100k) Expenses 0 ($175) Net assets 39 ($206k)2020 Revenue 196 ($307k) Expenses 35 ($97k) Net assets 119 ($621k)2021 Revenue 135 ($212k) Expenses 73 ($200k) Net assets 122 ($634k)2022 Revenue 0 ($0) Expenses 84 ($231k) Net assets 77 ($402k)2023 Revenue 127 ($200k) Expenses 102 ($282k) Net assets 62 ($321k)2024 Revenue 296 ($465k) Expenses 98 ($269k) Net assets 99 ($516k)2025 Revenue 550 ($863k) Expenses 144 ($397k) Net assets 189 ($982k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (550)Expenses (144)Net assets (189)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of REBUILD THE DREAM’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (84% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,530 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$118k
17
$410k
18
$100k
19
$210k
20
$12k
21
$231k
22
$82k
23
$196k
24
$466k
25
17
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $20k → $350k.

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of REBUILD THE DREAM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

REBUILD THE DREAM leans on a few funders — its largest provides 58% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund REBUILD THE DREAM.

58%
largest funder
85%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2023 86%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

REBUILD THE DREAM draws 94% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 5 states in all.

NY
CA
NC
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $185k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 266 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like REBUILD THE DREAM

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 2%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Dreamorg · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for REBUILD THE DREAM: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds REBUILD THE DREAM?
REBUILD THE DREAM (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,034,659 to it, the largest being THE JUST TRUST FOR ACTION ($600,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does REBUILD THE DREAM have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $1,034,659 in grants to REBUILD THE DREAM, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of REBUILD THE DREAM?
THE JUST TRUST FOR ACTION is the largest funder on record, with $600,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like REBUILD THE DREAM find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing