How much did SCHOXORG grant in FY2024?

SCHOXORG reported 2 grants totaling $20,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

SCHOXORG

Schox.org's primary exempt purpose is to provide grantmaking for charitable, educational, literary, scientific and religious purposes.

$20k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$10k

Largest

01What you fund

0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Education$175kHuman Services$100kCrime & Legal$70kYouth Development$60kPublic Benefit$50kEnvironment$45kRecreation & Sports$25kCommunity Improvement$25kPhilanthropy$25kOther$60k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

outreachcareerstechnologytraining

2020

wethriveentrepreneurialbaycurriculumhabitsblackentrepreneurship

2021

girlseducatorsstembuilding

2022

rightcarbonchildrengroupsequitableparental incarcerationadventure

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$36k

Total assets

Largest grants

CALIFORNIA YIMBY$10,000
STACKS JOULES$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Hack the Hood Inc

Hack the Hood provides free tech education training programs to youth of color via 8 - 12 week coding and data analytics bootcamps. These youth hone their skills by creating websites for small businesses and receive career exposure and…

Arts & Culture

Project Invent

Project Invent empowers students with the 21st-century skills to succeed individually and impact globally, through invention for social good.

Science & Tech

Oakland Kids First

Oakland Kids First is a community-based nonprofit in Oakland, CA that empowers young people to reimagine broken systems and organize for equitable public schools by providing youth leadership development, youth organizing, and community…

Youth Development

Oakland Digital Arts and Literacy Center Inc

BRIDGEGOOD educates job seekers by providing equitable access to technology creative design opportunities and essential professional resouces to build successful sustainable careers. See Schedule O.

Education

Institute for Applied Tinkering

Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.

Youth Development

Girls in Tech Inc

Girls in tech (git) is a global non-profit focused on the engagement, education and empowerment of girls and women who are passionate about technology. our aim is to accelerate the growth of innovative women who are entering into the…

—

Mission Bit

We build professional pathways for under-resourced high school youth across the SF Bay Area to unlock their full potential by making computer science more accessible through our free project-based courses.

Arts & Culture

Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education

Scientific Adventures dba Scientific

1. 27 week Afterschool STEM classes at East Bay Elementary Schools2. Monthly Family STEAM Events3. 5 Week Summer Programming at Schools and Libraries

Youth Development

Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. Activate partners with U.S.-based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment

Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services

360 Accelerator Education Partners

360 Accelerator provides leadership development services to public education leaders.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greene Scholars and the most unlike its peers is New Venture Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/30

the rest of the field

10%

5,563/57,221

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

29/30

Grantees still filing

25/30

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$175,000Human Services$100,000Crime & Legal$70,000Youth Development$60,000Public Benefit$50,000Environment$45,000Other$135,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA30× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Mitchell Kapor Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · Tides Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SCHOXORG funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GREENE SCHOLARS PROGRAM.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +89% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 811553490 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GREENE SCHOLARS PROGRAM, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Schoxorg?

Find your warmest path to Schoxorg through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SCHOXORG

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Schoxorg?

More from the funding graph

SCHOXORG

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Schoxorg?

More from the funding graph