Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

PACT INSTITUTE

PACT INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,711,379 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($8,232,529). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2021
$11M
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$15M
Net assets
$0
4/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 31%
01What it does

What Pact Institute does

Mission

Pact Institute works to achieve strategic objectives that improve the lives of people around the world who are poor and marginalized through innovation, the exploration of new approaches and partnerships, and funding diversification. It is a subsidiary of pact inc., an international development organization.

As stated on its FY2021 Form 990.

Program

The international tin supply chain initiative (itsci) pact leads field implementation and the only traceability and due diligence program for the 3t minerals (tin, tungsten, and tantalum) operating on a large-scale due diligence with standards 100% aligned with the oecd upstream due diligence guidance. Pact monitors over 2,250 artisanal and small-scale mines across the dr congo, rwanda, uganda and burundi, and myriad of local as well as international mining stakeholders. The itsci program objective is to initiate, develop and maintain a traceability and due diligence system that ensures local and international companies responsibly trade 3t minerals from africa's great lakes region in compliance with national and international laws and regulations (continued in schedule o)(section 1502 of the dodd frank act, sec rule as well as the oecd guidance). Through itsci 80,000, miners have been supporting around five million people with their activities in the mines. More than 5,500 stakeholders have been trained in 2021 on due diligence. Itsci has equally improved security and fostered peace in the region, in fact the project has drastically reduced non-state armed groups interference in…

The first program described on its most recent Form 990, which lists programs largest first by expense.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($24M) Expenses 100 ($23M) Net assets 100 ($4.8M)2018 Revenue 93 ($22M) Expenses 94 ($22M) Net assets 105 ($5.0M)2019 Revenue 93 ($22M) Expenses 94 ($22M) Net assets 112 ($5.4M)2020 Revenue 78 ($18M) Expenses 83 ($19M) Net assets 95 ($4.6M)2021 Revenue 48 ($11M) Expenses 69 ($16M) Net assets 0 ($0)
20172018201920202021
Revenue (48)Expenses (69)Net assets (0)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $11M to $0 (−100%).

$10M
$14M
$12M
$11M
$0
20172018201920202021
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 16%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$576k
’17
$235k
’18
$363k
’19
−$817k
’20
−$4.6M
’21
6.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20172018201920202021
Listed87778
Joined·+1+2+2+5
No longer listed·2224
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2020: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 2 funders, grant income fell $2.6M → $500k.

From the IRS filings of PACT INSTITUTE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PACT INSTITUTE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

56%
largest funder
99%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 97% · 2018 69% · 2019 60% · 2020 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

PACT INSTITUTE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 4 states in all.

WA
NY
CA
GA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like PACT INSTITUTE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

61% of spending goes to programs.

Program 61%Management 39%Fundraising 0%

Governance

2
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 4 related entities

  • Pact Inc · exempt
  • Pact Global Microfinance Fund · exempt
  • Pact Global (Uk) CIO · exempt
  • Pact Global · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PACT INSTITUTE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PACT INSTITUTE?
PACT INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,711,379 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($8,232,529). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PACT INSTITUTE have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $14,711,379 in grants to PACT INSTITUTE, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PACT INSTITUTE?
GATES FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $8,232,529 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PACT INSTITUTE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2021 (financials across 2017–2021), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing