Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Jackson Lewis Foundation

To support charitable organizations and activities.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
63
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Health$789kCrime & Legal$747kEducation$520kCivil Rights$307kHuman Services$230kPhilanthropy$139kCommunity Improvement$116kRecreation & Sports$95kOther$0
02FY2024 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 63 grants below total $815,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,317,978 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $502,228 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $124k
  • $10k–50k43 grants · $606k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$363k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING AMERICA$85,000
NACUA$37,500
AFTD$25,000
HNBA VIA - VISION IN ACTION-FUND$21,600
BALFOUR BEATTY COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION$20,500
WORKERS CIRCLE$20,000
EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS$20,000
ASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND$20,000
GREATER OMAHA CHAMBER FOUNDATION$20,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$20,000
CHICAGO-KENT COLLEGE OF LAW$17,500
DBA COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND$15,500
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$15,000
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
MEDSTAR HEALTH$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES: $7k → 9%RITE AID FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $8k → 11%NATIONAL CHAVEZ CENTER: $7k → 18%WELLLIFE NETWORK INC: $10k → 6%SUNRISE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%JDRF: $10k → 4%CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $8k → 11%CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $8k → 11%CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY OPTIONS INC: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY OPTIONS INC: $7k → 11%BIRCH FAMILY OF SERVICES: $11k → 17%BIRCH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITEE (BRC): $6k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $8k → 17%BIRCH FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED INC: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
SC
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 62 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
70

Total granted

$2.4M
$805k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+16%

Still filing today

97%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $239k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EJ
    EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $135k · revenue +19%
  • PB
    PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $130k · revenue +14%
  • II
    Illinois Institute of Technology
    6× · 2019–2024 · $94k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -54%
  • NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue -29%
  • D
    DKMSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
12
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Welllife Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Elementary Literacy TutoringFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…United Way AffiliatesLgbtq+ Community SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Local History MuseumsDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Mentoring ProgramsChristian Youth CampsImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Youth Sports ProgramsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/150
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,415

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

139 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 139 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
137/139
Grantees still filing
97/139
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC — $130,000 · OtherPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INCWorkers Circle Action Inc — $107,000 · OtherWorkers Circle Action IncNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY ATTORNEYS — $77,500 · OtherGREATER OMAHA CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $65,000 · OtherMOVE UNITED — $55,000 · OtherFeeding America — $85,000 · OtherFeeding America+62 more — $968,000 · Other+62 moreMEDSTAR HEALTH INC — $75,000 · HealthMEDSTAR HEALTH INCTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION — $65,000 · HealthTHE ASSOCIATION FOR…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $65,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED…H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · HealthH LEE MOFFITT CANCE…The Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc — $52,000 · HealthThe Summit Medical …JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · HealthJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDR…ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER — $39,000 · HealthENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL …Hartford Hospital — $30,000 · HealthDKMS — $30,000 · HealthThe Stamford Hospital — $21,000 · Health+13 more — $116,900 · Health+13 moreIllinois Institute of Technology — $93,500 · EducationIllinois Institute …The University of Texas Law School Foundation — $50,000 · EducationThe University of T…Fordham University — $45,000 · EducationFordham UniversityHNBA VIA-VISION IN ACTION-FUND — $41,600 · EducationHNBA VIA-VISION IN …CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $41,250 · EducationCULINARY INSTITUTE …THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $35,500 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSI…GREATER OMAHA ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS ETHICS — $30,000 · EducationLITERACY INC — $30,000 · EducationST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK — $30,000 · EducationNEBRASKA LEGAL DIVERSITY COUNCIL — $30,000 · EducationFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $27,500 · EducationChicago State Foundation — $22,500 · Education+12 more — $118,160 · Education+12 moreEQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $135,000 · Crime & LegalPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF OHIO — $35,150 · Crime & LegalLaw Foundation of Silicon Valley — $34,500 · Crime & LegalThe Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc — $32,000 · Crime & LegalLATINOJUSTICE PRLDEF — $17,500 · Crime & LegalPRO BONO INSTITUTE — $15,000 · Crime & LegalCHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO — $40,000 · Human ServicesCORPORATE COUNSEL WOMEN OF COLOR — $28,250 · Human ServicesBIRCH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $26,500 · Human ServicesRITE AID HEALTHY FUTURES — $20,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Options Inc — $14,750 · Human ServicesFUND FOR THE AGED INC — $14,000 · Human ServicesFUNDACION MMM INC — $13,500 · Human ServicesWELLLIFE NETWORK INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesFRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE COMMUNITY INC — $7,500 · Human Services+4 more — $25,600 · Human ServicesNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $30,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY INC UNITED WAY OF CENT & NE CONNECTICUT — $27,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $21,310 · PhilanthropyUNITED HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyMARCUM FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE INDIANAPOLIS COLTS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyWABC RADIO FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyKBR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · PhilanthropyTRAVELERS FOUNDATION — $6,000 · PhilanthropyNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $40,000 · Civil RightsNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $40,000 · Civil RightsThe Minority Corporate Counsel Association Inc — $25,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL LESBIAN AND GAY LAW FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC — $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,487,500Health$598,900Education$595,010Crime & Legal$269,150Human Services$210,100Philanthropy$161,810Civil Rights$125,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $135,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC — $130,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetIllinois Institute of Technology — $93,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $85,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY ATTORNEYS — $77,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMEDSTAR HEALTH INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER OMAHA CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION — $65,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOVE UNITED — $55,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc — $52,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetThe University of Texas Law School Foundation — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFordham University — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHNBA VIA-VISION IN ACTION-FUND — $41,600 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $41,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBET TZEDEK — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA MILTON MILLER MEMORIAL FUND INC — $40,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER — $39,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $35,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF OHIO — $35,150 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL — $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC — $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLaw Foundation of Silicon Valley — $34,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc — $32,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONINC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER OMAHA ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS ETHICS — $30,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIMOTHY E NETTLES MEMORIAL FUND — $30,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetHartford Hospital — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDKMS — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA LEGAL DIVERSITY COUNCIL — $30,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetCORPORATE COUNSEL WOMEN OF COLOR — $28,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY INC UNITED WAY OF CENT & NE CONNECTICUT — $27,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CAMP SOLES INC — $27,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBIRCH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $26,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Bar Association — $26,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH AUTOMOTIVE TRAINING CENTER OF BROWARD — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sidley Austin Fou…United Way Miami IncLittler Mendelson Fou…The Gibson Dunn & Cru…Perkins Coie Foundati…Quinn Emanuel Foundat…Wachtell Lipton Rosen…Katten Muchin Rosenma…Munger Tolles & Olson…The New York Communit…The Hyde and Watson F…Weil Gotshal & Manges…
The Sidley Austin FoundationIL33.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sidley Austin Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · Littler Mendelson Foundation Inc Attn Tax Manager · The Gibson Dunn & Crutcher Foundation · Perkins Coie Foundation · Quinn Emanuel Foundation · Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Foundation · Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc · Munger Tolles & Olson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Weil Gotshal & Manges Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jackson Lewis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Autism New Jersey Inc — 44% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Move United — 16% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University — 1% of income from government
  • Hartford Hospital — 0% of income from government
  • Community Options Inc — 0% of income from government
  • The Stamford Hospital — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jackson Lewis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jackson Lewis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 150 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines