Loading…
Loading…
Oregon · Nonprofit
NON-PROFIT TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE NETWORK (Oregon) is funded by 15 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $10,239,879 in grants to it, the largest being THE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG ($4,660,000). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
NON-PROFIT TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE NETWORK's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,533 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2025 7%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
69% of NON-PROFIT TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE NETWORK’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (49% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $5k → $100k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
6 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 41% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of NON-PROFIT TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE NETWORK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
NON-PROFIT TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE NETWORK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 46% of grant income and the top three 71%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 92% · 2019 52% · 2020 38% · 2021 54% · 2022 63% · 2023 85% · 2024 84% · 2025 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
54% of NON-PROFIT TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE NETWORK's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 73% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
NON-PROFIT TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE NETWORK draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 10 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 15 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $100k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
78% of spending goes to programs.
67%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 15funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing