How much did THE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of THE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2020

stabilization bedsgoal expandingdistribution foodcovid responserenovation facilityimplementation stabilizationshelters

2021

trainathleticscdfi buildbuild nonprofitsresilient impactsimpacts covidcovid loan

2022

robertukrainianraises helpshelps achievequeermemory belovedhighland park

2023

war israelimpacted displaceddisplaced warisrael tripresponse impactedappreciation participatingparticipating israel

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 778 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k101 grants · $397k
$10k–50k268 grants · $5.4M
$50k–250k257 grants · $28M
$250k+152 grants · $86M

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.1B

Total assets

Largest grants

WAI'ANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$6,835,620
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC$3,850,000
THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE$3,000,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC$1,800,000
NATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS$1,300,000
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$1,250,000
NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES INC$1,100,000
FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC$1,050,000
THE JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL$1,000,000
PER SCHOLAS INC$1,000,000
BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION$1,000,000
KESHET$1,000,000
UJA - FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$1,000,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$1,000,000
GOODWILL OF CENTRAL & SOUTHERN INDIANA$1,000,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $53.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of THE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

THE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERGlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$541M · 780 repeat orgs$199M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.

780 repeat relationships — 420 still active in FY2024, 360 since wound down; 165 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

780

542

Total granted

$541M

$183M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%

+56%

Still filing today

73%

65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TA
THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE
5× · 2020–2024 · $20M · revenue +13%
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $19M · revenue +24%
FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $17M · revenue +121%

Funded once

VS
VARIOUS - SEE ATTACHMENT 1
one grant, 2018 · $100M
TO
THE OGEN GROUP
one grant, 2022 · $3.0M
HA
HOUSING ACCELERATOR FUND
one grant, 2022 · $3.0M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

Create opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives and communities.

—

International Community Health Services

Provide health services to improve the health of asian pacific islander and other communities.

Health

Housing Unlimited Inc

To address the housing crisis for adults in mental health recovery in montgomery county, md.

Housing & Shelter

Abilitypath Housing

To advance advocacy, inclusion, and independence for people with developmental disabilities

Human Services

The Bronx Parent Housing Network Inc

Bronx parent housing network is committed to making a difference in solving the housing problem in bronx parent housing network is committed to making a difference in solving the housing problem in new york city by transforming lives and…

Human Services

One Community Health

To advance health and social justice for all members of our community.

—

Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

To support the delivery of health care services to patients in the new york metropolitan area.

Health

National Low Income Housing Coalition

Achieve racially & socially equitable housing policies for the lowest-income people.

Housing & Shelter

Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education

Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. strives to build a stronger workforce through career, skills training, employment services for career seekers, business services for employers, and labor market insights for smart workforce solutions and innovation.

Employment

Institute for Public Health Innovation

Iphi develops multi-sector partnerships and innovative solutions to improve the public's health and well-being across maryland, virginia and the district of columbia. our work strengthens health systems and policy, enhances conditions that…

Human Services

The Nasdaq Entrepreneurial Center Inc

Deliver world-class resources and mentoring to enable every entrepreneur across the globe to realize their maximum potential.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Start Early. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.4%4/1,075

the rest of the field

11%

206,160/1,818,490

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

1045 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

340

Early backer (in before they grew)

1030/1045

Grantees still filing

850/1045

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$443,936,049Human Services$66,480,190Philanthropy$59,623,796Education$50,141,800Housing & Shelter$44,597,000Employment$39,336,120Health$36,310,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Abell Foundation IncMD147.8× affinity114 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Abell Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The Morris Goldseker Foundation · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · David & Barbara B Hirschhorn · Aloha United Way Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE HARRY AND JEANETTE WEINBERG funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

21get no government money at all

6rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ELDER ABUSE SOLUTIONS INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 814714384 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ELDER ABUSE SOLUTIONS INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg?

Find your warmest path to The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

More from the funding graph

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

Strange bedfellows

the named clusters of US funding

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines