· Private foundation
The Cricket Island Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k32 grants · $160k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k6 grants · $365k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GROW DAT YOUTH FARM | $85,000 |
| RETHINK | $65,000 |
| YOUTH MINISTRIES FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE | $60,000 |
| FAMILIES & FRIENDS OF LOUISIANA'S INCARCERATED CHILDREN | $55,000 |
| NEO PHILANTHROPY INC FBO YOUTH ENGAGEMENT FUND | $50,000 |
| BEND THE ARC FBO FCYO | $50,000 |
| NOLLIE JENKINS FAMILY CENTER INC | $45,000 |
| MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT FBO YOUTH ART AND SELF-EMPOWERMENT PROJECT | $45,000 |
| HIGHLANDER RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CENTER FBO POWER U CENTER | $45,000 |
| CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION FBO SAN FRANCISCO RISING | $45,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN RESOURCE WORKSHOP INC | $45,000 |
| DESIS RISING UP & MOVING (DRUM) | $45,000 |
| HANA CENTER | $45,000 |
| NEW YORK STATE YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL | $45,000 |
| MEKONG CENTER | $45,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $871k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GDGROW DAT YOUTH FARM6× · 2019–2024 · $580k · revenue +35%
- KRKIDS RETHINK NEW ORLEANS SCHOOLS6× · 2019–2024 · $458k · revenue +48%
- FAFAMILIES AND FRIENDS OF LOUISIANAS INCARCERATED CHILDREN6× · 2019–2024 · $408k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- BPBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY FBO LEADERSHIP TRANSITIONS PROJECTone grant, 2019 · $135k
- NVNEW VENTURE FUND FBO COMMUNITY FOR JUST SCHOOLS FUNDone grant, 2019 · $50k
- ABA BETTER WAY FOUNDATION FBO CT BLACK & BROWN STUDENT UNIONone grant, 2023 · $45k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Youth represent uses legal services, policy advocacy, peer education, and other tools to build power and opportunity for black, latine, and other youth of color who the criminal legal system and other systems of oppression harm the most.…
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon
Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
The Youth Activism Project teaches teens movement-building skills to make policy impact at all levels of government. We envision a world in which youth activism is the norm, not the exception. We know that even though many young people are…
Communities Rise fosters movements to build power in communities impacted by systemic oppression. To create an equitable system, we pursue cross-sector collaboration, and provide capacity building and legal services for community…
Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.
Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…
Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Nuleadership On Urban Solutions Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GROW DAT YOUTH FARM ↗
- Who funds KIDS RETHINK NEW ORLEANS SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds YOUTH UNITED FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES AND FRIENDS OF LOUISIANAS INCARCERATED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds DRUM Desis Rising Up and Moving Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STATE YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc ↗
- Who funds Southside Together Organizing For Power ↗
- Who funds ROCKAWAY YOUTH TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds Mekong Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED ↗
- Who funds Puentes New Orleans Incorporated ↗
- Who funds FIERCE ↗
- Who funds Little Village Environmental Justice Org ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO FREEDOM SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Asian Pacific Environmental Network ↗
- Who funds NOLLIE JENKINS FAMILY CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Poder in Action ↗
- Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Coleman Children and Youth Services dba Coleman Advocates for Children & Youth ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL ACTION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Rise Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds GENTE ORGANIZADA ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN RESOURCE WORKSHOP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · The Edward W Hazen Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Surdna Foundation Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · The Ford Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Marguerite Casey Foundation · New York Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Cricket Island Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Asian American Resource Workshop Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Cricket Island Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Cricket Island Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.