Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
MITCHELL KAPOR FOUNDATION (California) is funded by 21 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $7,258,848 in grants to it, the largest being Tides Foundation ($2,206,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
MITCHELL KAPOR FOUNDATION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 695 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 695 philanthropy nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
$1.0M from 1 funders in 2024, up from $1.7M and 3 in 2017.
7 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 40% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of MITCHELL KAPOR FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
MITCHELL KAPOR FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 30% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 81% · 2018 57% · 2019 78% · 2020 30% · 2021 94% · 2022 68% · 2023 80% · 2024 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
11% of MITCHELL KAPOR FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 29% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
MITCHELL KAPOR FOUNDATION draws 55% of its grant income from funders outside California — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 7 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 21 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 21funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing