Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation)

To create public awareness of the need for cancer research by conducting a fundraising dinner/auction and educating attendees of the need for cancer research.

$639k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$603k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$6.4MHuman Services$133kHealth$80kYouth Development$68kEducation$50kArts & Culture$20kFood & Nutrition$15kPublic Benefit$10kOther$93k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $250k+1 grant · $603k
$602,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$516k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL$602,500
PROJECT FUTURE INC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FULL OF GRACE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 8%SDSI FOUNDATION: $13k → 12%MIKE TYSON CARES: $40k → 12%THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%MIKE TYSON CARES: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NY
OH
CA
CO
MO
WV
KS
TN
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.5M · 7 repeat orgs$371k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
19

Total granted

$6.5M
$346k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.3M · revenue +2%
  • LD
    LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $50k · revenue +167%
  • KF
    Kyles Family Foundation
    4× · 2019–2023 · $41k · revenue +402% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • BD
    BREES DREAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -18%
  • TM
    THE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +19%
  • DM
    DALLAS MAVERICKS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mlb-Mlbpa Youth Development Foundation
Recreation & Sports
2
The Dylan Williams Forever an All Star Foundation
Unclassified
3
The David Mduffy Jr Foundation Co Brosnan & Associates Llp
Philanthropy
4
John Jordan Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Deangelo Williams Foundation
—
6
Tyrese Maxey Foundation
Youth Development
7
The Dustin J Wells Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Bigger Than Ball Foundation
Recreation & Sports
9
Michael-Gene Kids Basketball Foundation
Human Services
10
Jeremy Lin Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Victory Sports Foundation
—
12
The Will Smith Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mr October Foundation for Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Community Arts OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsVeteran Support ServicesCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%33%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%3%20–35yr11%93%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,952

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
14/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $6,277,250 · PhilanthropyNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+5 more — $120,000 · PhilanthropyMike Tyson Cares Inc — $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC — $12,500 · Human ServicesFULL OF GRACE FOUNDATION INC — $5,252 · Human ServicesPROJECT FUTURE INC — $25,000 · OtherLos Angeles Bible Training School — $25,000 · OtherTHE JUMP AND BALL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherMAGIC JOHNSON FOUNDATION INC — $13,200 · OtherCINCINNATI SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherLADYLIKE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS — $10,000 · OtherLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 · HealthLIFEDRIVEN FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $10,000 · HealthKyles Family Foundation — $40,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG WARRIORS — $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentGATEWAY PGA REACH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMr October Foundation for Kids — $25,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · EducationAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$6,397,250Human Services$132,752Other$118,200Health$80,000Youth Development$68,000Education$50,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $6,277,250 over 8y, 15% of budgetLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBREES DREAM FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetKyles Family Foundation — $40,500 over 4y, 27% of budgetDALLAS MAVERICKS FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMr October Foundation for Kids — $25,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLos Angeles Bible Training School — $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetAPOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JUMP AND BALL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetYOUNG WARRIORS — $17,500 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetLADYLIKE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPat & Emmitt Smith Charities — $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCINCINNATI SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEDRIVEN FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetGATEWAY PGA REACH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMERGING VETS AND PLAYERS — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRIS TUCKER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFULL OF GRACE FOUNDATION INC — $5,252 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitabl…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation)?

    Find your warmest path to The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines