Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL

MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL (Texas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $74,930 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($40,500). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 90% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$398k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$75k
Net assets
$8k
4/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 11%
01What it does

What Mission Critical International does

Mission

Mission Critical is training international pastors, encouraging the global body of Christ, speaking in men's and women's leadership conferences, preaching in schools and prisons, and holding citywide gospel crusades. We have an orphan initiative called Mission Moroto that houses, loves, and feeds 300 Karamojong orphans in Moroto District Uganda.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Mission Moroto is our orphanage for 400 children in Moroto Uganda Africa. We house, feed, clothe, treat medically, and love and educate these orphans. In 2025 we continued extensive renovation and new construction of the facilities in accordance with the growth of the orphan population and expanded feeding programs into 28 local villages. We expanded our primary school to 6th grade and are serving just at 300 students.

    $259,378 spent
    66% of program spending
  2. Mountainside Christian Church is our church we founded in 2022 in Rupa, Uganda. It now has satellite churches in 28 local villages.

    $50,194 spent
    13% of program spending
  3. Kolle-Bullen Bible College is our pastor training center founded in 2022.

    $80,522 spent
    21% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $390,094.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($63k) Expenses 100 ($38k) Net assets 100 ($55k)2021 Revenue 483 ($305k) Expenses 793 ($303k) Net assets 58 ($32k)2022 Revenue 526 ($332k) Expenses 875 ($335k) Net assets 55 ($30k)2023 Revenue 1050 ($664k) Expenses 1761 ($674k) Net assets 36 ($20k)2024 Revenue 714 ($451k) Expenses 1231 ($471k) Net assets 0 ($0)2025 Revenue 630 ($398k) Expenses 1020 ($390k) Net assets 14 ($8k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (630)Expenses (1020)Net assets (14)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $55k to $32k (−42%).

$55k
$32k
$30k
$20k
$0
$8k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,945 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$25k
’20
$2k
’21
−$2k
’22
−$10k
’23
−$20k
’24
$8k
’25
0.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Matthew E Bullen

Executive Director

Board chair

Luke Elliott Bullen

Chairman of the Board

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

202020212022202320242025
Listed777777
Joined·+0+0+0+0+1
No longer listed·00001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $1k → $3k.

5 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 90% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 54% of grant income and the top three 87%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

90% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL.

54%
largest funder
87%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 55% · 2022 100% · 2023 97% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

90% of MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $8k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Texas funders.

TX

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $67k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,468 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin2% · below the median
Months of reserve0.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)44% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,468 international nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

TX

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL?
MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL (Texas) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $74,930 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($40,500). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 90% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $74,930 in grants to MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL?
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $40,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MISSION CRITICAL INTERNATIONAL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Mission Critical International →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing